I understand what you're trying to say, and as an anti-capitalist I want to agree with your sentiment. But the truth of the matter is, statistically (just google it) most multimillionaires and billionaires living today acheived their wealth through inheritance. They were born rich. Generational wealth inheritance makes up an overwhelming majority of the richest 1%'s source of income. I don't think being born rich inherently makes someone heartless/ruthless or whatever."In your eyes the rich are always heartless and ruthless."
I mean... they are though writer. They may not all be murderers, but in order to be rich you sure as shit have to be a ruthless bastard, that's just how Capitalism works. Constructing your simping-for-rich-people argument like this is pretty pathetic and does not make the enlightened or nuanced point you think it does, just because you wrote the internal reality of this story to justify it.
You are correct that the process is not automatic or inherent. However there are substantial pressures on the psychology of nepo babies by their environment that make developing into terrible people much more likely, and judging by the behaviour of those who come from inherited wealth, I would speculate that statistically not many of them manage to escape those brain worms.I understand what you're trying to say, and as an anti-capitalist I want to agree with your sentiment. But the truth of the matter is, statistically (just google it) most multimillionaires and billionaires living today acheived their wealth through inheritance. They were born rich. Generational wealth inheritance makes up an overwhelming majority of the richest 1%'s source of income. I don't think being born rich inherently makes someone heartless/ruthless or whatever.
tip: every time you read a manhua like this where Every Important Character Is Rich And Powerful And Hot And Correct you can just whisper "dont worry theyre just girlbosses" under your breath repeatedly and the problematicness goes awayThis story is starting to get... troublesome. The most recent chapter in particular is acting as apologetics for police misconduct and repeating without question certain assumptions about the nature, value and moral rightness of modern policing. The fact that the story is framing Miss Forensics' coercion of a suspect and use of inadmissible evidence as leverage being morally justifiable is... pretty yikes.
Even the more straight-laced-by-the-books lead is using fairly coercive tactics to try and get the outcome she wants, with the sweet little lie of sentencing leniency for a confession, something that has never actually been any sort of legally binding agreement and thus the cops and/or court can renege on that at any time.
It would be nice...Will this ever get an update?
So true…this stuff is so popular in China but I just can’t read it over here with all those restrictions (but there are English translations, they are just behind a paywall and stuff, so…meh.)It would be nice...