She is assuming humans will behave in favor of a nebulous collective and are not individuals at their core.Props to the human to speak truth to power.
Also, I love that she is in favor true communism.
100% she doesn't understand that. Her goal is to learn and understand humans, remember she didnt even know about having to ration your money and getting kicked out.Her assessment makes it seem like the creature is under some vague assumption that everyone would just contribute to the shared resources, and not attempt to get more than they need, or just lase around if it came to that. She does know humans aren't on some level of hivemind right?
let us hope......let's just be glad "she" hasn't discovered prostitution yet.
There’s also the teeny tiny obstacle of capitalistic powers doing everything possible (e.g. regime change, war, economic sanctions) to interfere to ensure that alternative forms of resource distribution fail."What you're describing is called "communism". It's been tried several times, but the problem with that system is that it requires profound centralization of power and a massive bureaucracy. Turns out when you put those two things together, the people you ask to run the system will abuse their power to enrich themselves obscenely, to the detriment of everybody else. Usually it's the representatives of the government who hold all that power, and are the ones who become corrupt. You get narcissism and cronyism in your government officials, and usually the ruling group will excise anyone competent enough to be a potential threat, resulting in absurd levels of systemic ineptitude.
Though, nobody's ever attempted communism with a direct democracy, which I figure would have the best shot at actually working. A direct democracy would divide power among all the members of the society, so nobody would have enough power to take advantage, theoretically. Then again, that would have it's own issues, like populism and political parties, so I'm not convinced it would work any better.
The American Amish have a fairly successful collectivist system, but it's only been done on small scales and in ethnically uniform groups, so I don't know how it'd work world-wide."
"it seems avarice is a fatal flaw of your sociopolitical systems, human."
"Yeah, it seems that way..."
That is also part of the problem, yes. It would have been extremely valuable data for there to be more small communistic states to study (as opposed to say, the USSR, which was Massive). Perhaps communism works on smaller scales only. If so, what are the upper limits of it's viable scale? Having more data on that would be valuable.There’s also the teeny tiny obstacle of capitalistic powers doing everything possible (e.g. regime change, war, economic sanctions) to interfere to ensure that alternative forms of resource distribution fail.
Pretty much every developed economy (certainly every western nation at least) has an extensive enough welfare system that sleeping rough (though not necessarily homelessness as they are different) is a choice. Of course she probably doesn't know how to access any of it. Obviously Senukin being Vietnamese and therefore this probably being set in Vietnam I don't know how extensive their welfare state is but I would also like to point out something ironic considering the state of the comment section.She might be leaning a little into altruism. According to her the best thing would be everyone helping each other out. This isn't just about how capitalism sucks but why people not helping each other sucks.
I'm sure if I read this again while focusing on stuff like her being homeless, smelly and weird then I'll find it to be funnier.
Part of that is because she doesn't understand the world, if she did then she would probably do better. People sleep rough all the time without dying.Fair assessment, if it wasn't for her possession abilities, she'd be dead for sure.
A good chunk of them are supporting communists so don't worry, you aren't the dumbest person in the comment section.Amazing how we're collectively gathering around chain-smoking eldritch-chan's story to debate about society of all thingstho yall are too smart muh brain hurts trying to follow lel
Look up kibbutzimThat is also part of the problem, yes. It would have been extremely valuable data for there to be more small communistic states to study (as opposed to say, the USSR, which was Massive). Perhaps communism works on smaller scales only. If so, what are the upper limits of it's viable scale? Having more data on that would be valuable.