I swear...Created Mangadex Forums account to recognize peak
Thanks for the chapter
Depends on where you live. In my state, there is no difference between the two words. However, everywhere else, it generally depends on your qualifications, the services you can perform, and your responsibilities. Cosmetologists are held to a higher standard and go through a more advanced training process. Beauticians usually do more basic stuff and their schools don't offer specialist courses.is cosmetician a word? according to the spellcheck in my browser it is but I've never heard the term before, is it the same thing as a beautician or what is the difference?
I doubt they'll try to make him look like a misunderstood victim and it's just his version of the past that he remembers.Also, why gave him a tragic back story that he was a misunderstood good guy only to say that, but never mind, he's actually evil anyway now. So... why should we care or sympathize then? This could work if you span it over multiple chapters, like presented him as a pervert suspect, then reveal that, no, he was framed over good intention, then subvert it again that, but now that shit storm fuck him up to be an actual bad guy. You can't do that over the span of 5 pages and think it'll work...
Couldn't care less still; that's just a difference between a bad guy that used to be good and a bad guy that deluded he used to be good.I doubt they'll try to make him look like a misunderstood victim and it's just his version of the past that he remembers.
There's nothing to sympathize with, they just showed his past so you'd understand what happened. It's like watching a serial killer documentary, they tell you they was mistreated, abused, or abandoned, and you empathize with them... Until they kills 5 kid in a Walmart parking lot and all you can think is, "Fuck them!"Couldn't care less still; that's just a difference between a bad guy that used to be good and a bad guy that deluded he used to be good.
This tracks back to author wants to have a cake and eats it too, again.
Last time they wanted to write Konno to be a pushover that got gang-raped and become a slut who got SA left and right but also seems to enjoy it to certain extent so this things keeps going on, but then also want the story to be wholesome (hello?).
This time they just want to write Higashioka to be a pure evil for the disgusting factor and what not, but at the same time also want him to be a sympathize-able villain with depth, also at the same, again, want him to be a one-time villain and doesn't want to spend to many pages developing his character. All these are clashing with each other and they just decided to cram everything together, resulting in a hot mess.
One difference I see is, serial killer documentaries exist because people are curious about what drives someone to commit such horrible things and they serve as case studies -- helping people recognize warning signs and possibly prevent future tragedies. But here, prevention part is out the window from the get go. Does anyone wonder why he did that, then? I think not. Most people, if not all, would just chalk it to him being horny, a pedo, a pervert, or just plainly a bad person; and that's enough to be the reason for a work of fiction like this. If you want to present the reason, fine, but it has to be interesting. This is not.There's nothing to sympathize with, they just showed his past so you'd understand what happened. It's like watching a serial killer documentary, they tell you they was mistreated, abused, or abandoned, and you empathize with them... Until they kills 5 kid in a Walmart parking lot and all you can think is, "Fuck them!"
Knowing the past ≠ Justify actions
I think it's kind of impressive that the mangaka could craft a backstory that aaaaaaaalmost made you forget this guy furiously ejaculated on a picture of Komaru.Also, why gave him a tragic back story that he was a misunderstood good guy only to say that, but never mind, he's actually evil now anyway.
is cosmetician a word? according to the spellcheck in my browser it is but I've never heard the term before, is it the same thing as a beautician or what is the difference?
Merriam-Webster says a cosmetician is "professionally trained in the use of cosmetics" while a beautician is "licensed to provide cosmetic treatments". That implies to me that @enter51 is correct.Depends on where you live. In my state, there is no difference between the two words. However, everywhere else, it generally depends on your qualifications, the services you can perform, and your responsibilities. Cosmetologists are held to a higher standard and go through a more advanced training process. Beauticians usually do more basic stuff and their schools don't offer specialist courses.