@definitionofinsanity
I'm not sure why you'd revive a 2 month old discussion, or why I even care enough to respond, but you're seriously mistaken on many points.
Are you aware that even before the Fukushima meltdown, nuclear power plants only provided around 30% of Japan's electricity? After the meltdown, all but a few of their plants have been shut down, and currently provide only about 5% of Japan's electricity.
And that's just electricity. When talking overall energy consumption (electricity, fuel for vehicles, fuel for heating, etc), 84% of Japan's energy consumption was from imported oil, which in this situation would be cut off. And again, these stats are all from before they shut down nearly all of their nuclear power generation, it's probably over 90% right now.
While they could theoretically restart some of their nuclear reactors in this situation, they also rely entirely on imported uranium to fuel them, and restarting dormant reactors isn't a simple process.
If you think that Japan (or any modern country that isn't energy and food independent) could be picked out of the world and placed somewhere else without falling apart, you'd be seriously mistaken.
The damage that would occur in the first few days would be catastrophic. Just the panic in the major cities would kill a significant portion of the population. Can you imagine millions of people without electricity, food, or fuel trying to escape the major metropolitan centers once public services shut down? It'd be like something out of an post-apocalypse move.