Yeah, get what you say. The ideals are nice, but they take it too far when the individual is absolutely clearly f'd in the head. ...Batman must really drive you up the wall, yeah?Teachers suddenly remembering their duty and springing into action the moment the bullied kid finally fights back.
Torturing the scum that gravely injured and murdered loads of innocent people is excessive huh? I'll seriously never understand the logic with Japanese story tellers, where the villains always get to do whatever the hell they want and ruin countless lives but can never get what they deserve because the main character is forced to be "good" and "kind". All it is is just self-serving hypocrisy when you fully have the power to stop loads of innocent people getting harmed and killed but refuse to do so just because you don't want to get blood on your own hands. Same bullshit is why I could never get into classic superhero comics.
Killing a killer to save the lives of hundreds and thousands doesn't make you "just like them", this is the retarded logic that pisses me off the most with manga.
And I guess the new cover is supposed to imply that he's supposed to be the dark angel to this knight dude's self-righteous bs?
Anyway, surprised to see another piece of a chapter so soon. Does this tell of a better release schedule or just an even longer wait for the next one? Time will tell.
That means she's the one he especially can't let leave/live.and technically she was their most important one that we know of, the one that controlled their zombie monster army
Tbf, they need info, so keeping one alive is necessary, as Nito said. The issue was that Nito just wanted to torture them to death, not bothering with getting info. Not to mention, if he really is trying to do the right thing, then a swift kill would be the morally right thing to do. Not torture until death.Teachers suddenly remembering their duty and springing into action the moment the bullied kid finally fights back.
Torturing the scum that gravely injured and murdered loads of innocent people is excessive huh? I'll seriously never understand the logic with Japanese story tellers, where the villains always get to do whatever the hell they want and ruin countless lives but can never get what they deserve because the main character is forced to be "good" and "kind". All it is is just self-serving hypocrisy when you fully have the power to stop loads of innocent people getting harmed and killed but refuse to do so just because you don't want to get blood on your own hands. Same bullshit is why I could never get into classic superhero comics.
Killing a killer to save the lives of hundreds and thousands doesn't make you "just like them", this is the retarded logic that pisses me off the most with manga.
And I guess the new cover is supposed to imply that he's supposed to be the dark angel to this knight dude's self-righteous bs?
Anyway, surprised to see another piece of a chapter so soon. Does this tell of a better release schedule or just an even longer wait for the next one? Time will tell.
The courts in both dc and marvel have never and will never do anything aside from "locking them up" only for them to get out and cause trouble of again. The whole idea of "let the courts handle it" has long become a joke to anyone that tries to analyze the logical consistency of either of those settings even in passing. This in combination with the comical extremes they take any "what if so-and-so broke their no kill rule" hypotheticals to is just proof of all their writers being retards high on their own farts.Tbf, they need info, so keeping one alive is necessary, as Nito said. The issue was that Nito just wanted to torture them to death, not bothering with getting info. Not to mention, if he really is trying to do the right thing, then a swift kill would be the morally right thing to do. Not torture until death.
Also, classic superheroes don't kill mainly because they are vigilantes, who can't cross that line because it's technically illegal for them to do so iirc. Plus, it's the court's job to execute the really dangerous criminals, not the superheroes. Injustice and Superman vs the Elites shows what would have happened if Superman killed. Terrifying.
The issue still remains of how they're going to get information out of them in the first place, it's already proven that none of them are strong enough to deal with them without the mc's help and with the mc's help, they're still going to have to rely on torture anyway. So yes, while they need to keep at least one alive to try and get further information out of them, the mc's is still justified in torturing them as he pleases before death.Tbf, they need info, so keeping one alive is necessary, as Nito said. The issue was that Nito just wanted to torture them to death, not bothering with getting info. Not to mention, if he really is trying to do the right thing, then a swift kill would be the morally right thing to do. Not torture until death.
Also, classic superheroes don't kill mainly because they are vigilantes, who can't cross that line because it's technically illegal for them to do so iirc. Plus, it's the court's job to execute the really dangerous criminals, not the superheroes. Injustice and Superman vs the Elites shows what would have happened if Superman killed. Terrifying.
You don't get to dress up like a bat and beat up people in the night and claim you're on the side of legality, you don't get to throw yourself into situations without creating an obligation for yourself to see it through to the end, you don't get to claim to be on the side of justice while allowing the lives of innocents to be ruined and ended just so you can preserve your own concience and keep blood off your own hands.Yeah, get what you say. The ideals are nice, but they take it too far when the individual is absolutely clearly f'd in the head. ...Batman must really drive you up the wall, yeah?
I mean how would you know which of the two bozos have the highest chance to tell on their bosses? After that is a completely different matter....There's a fair argument that keeping one alive to interrogate later is the wisest move, regardless of morality on killing them or not.
But, as the MC said, keeping one of them alive. Keeping both would have been preferable since one might have information the other does not.