Well, honestly, unless the descendants could choose how high and where it flies, the creator does hold some of the responsibility essentially making a timebomb in the sky that causes disasters if not properly maintained, apparently by very specific people (if anyone could do the maintenance, would also be slightly less problems, as if the bloodline dies out its always a timebomb)Yeah let's blame the problem caused by the descendants to their ancestors
I agree, but would like to add that going back to chapter one, it is mentioned that dungeons, and even monsters might be creations of travellers. And in chapter three Asteria mentions that a traveller created crops that supplanted all the native crops of the world.Well, honestly, unless the descendants could choose how high and where it flies, the creator does hold some of the responsibility essentially making a timebomb in the sky that causes disasters if not properly maintained, apparently by very specific people (if anyone could do the maintenance, would also be slightly less problems, as if the bloodline dies out its always a timebomb)
Technically I don't think anything the travellers have been said to do have necessarily been done out of any ill intent. The dungeons/monsters-thing is questionable, but there might have been a reason for it, have read other stuff where dungeons siphon off miasma or similar.Remember that the account of the travellers is from those who hate them so it is unreliable. Who knows what really happen. They might just been used as scapegoats.
Yea, that is so ridiculous.So people hate otherworlder's because they're descendants didn't take care of a floating city?
No that is not reasonable.Mostly the problems seem to be unintended consequences from actions taken by people with extreme power. The reason for wanting the travellers dead seem to be to stop these unintended consequences, and potentially stop someone who would actually use their powers for ill.
Which seems reasonable as one travellers supposedly wiped out local fauna,
It did not say there was a blood requirement, and it was based on a material from that world for might not have had one. Just they stopped maintaining it properly.Well, honestly, unless the descendants could choose how high and where it flies, the creator does hold some of the responsibility essentially making a timebomb in the sky that causes disasters if not properly maintained, apparently by very specific people (if anyone could do the maintenance, would also be slightly less problems, as if the bloodline dies out its always a timebomb)
Try to to look at it from the point of view of the native population. If space-aliens came to Earth repeatedly and each time they came here things were horribly messed up in some way, and/or a lot of people died.No that is not reasonable.
Not even close by any valid system of ethics.
Killing someone because they might do something can never be justified.
If you know they will do something disastrous that is different, but might can not be morally justified.
You need to try and use the potential for the greater good first, and see if they can be reasoned with to show restraint.
But this is not a developed society, they are simple mindsets.
It seems kinda irresponsible to make a giant floating rock that doesn't have an automatic emergency shut-down procedure unless the creator didn't come from Earth, but came from a place full of people who took perfect care of everything forever.It did not say there was a blood requirement, and it was based on a material from that world for might not have had one. Just they stopped maintaining it properly.
But unless it was locked in 1 location then they should have been able to at least control its movement and put it over water. and there should have been warning signs.