Not sure if I'm spoiling, butbhere you go...What the heck are other adventurers doing if he's ranked at 32? Didn't a few of them die right away (or am I recalling a different isekai with a similar presence) and he was always top viewed thanks to his alleged crimes?
I mean, I know that his name has all but been cleared in the original world and he's been making people watch a black screen more often than not, but that low of a rank is surprising. Makes me wonder what extreme things others are doing to be above him, or maybe it's just because he's in his inn room and that isn't an overall count compared to when they were out fighting.
For future reference.Not sure if I'm spoiling, butbhere you go...
Most of them died the first month. Especially those that didn't have a combative profile.The first 'batch' of chosen ones is like a tutorial for those on earth on things to not to do. At the very end of the manga, you might find some answers.
Guess what, idfk if it's in the manga.For future reference.
If it's information from a future point of the story, it's spoiler.
If it's information that's current but the manga didn't go over it (I.E. something mentioned in LN/WN before or at this time), it's not a spoiler.
let's study this case. we assume that ppl cannot watch multiple streams at the same time.There would have to be over 10.5b people on earth if he was only 32nd with 329m concurrent viewers, not assuming someone would be able to watch multiple people at once.
That's.... one of the worst rapings of math I have witnessed in a while...let's study this case. we assume that ppl cannot watch multiple streams at the same time.
let's represent the number of viewers (IN BILLIONS) by position in ranking by a function. let's simply guess it is an exponential function, bc i said so: f( n )=a * exp(b * n) (with n in N*, and a,b in R).
aka:
N*→R+
n→a × exp(b × n)
we know that: f(0)=1 and f(32)=0.329
using an application for this kind of shit (personally used Numworks), we have:
f( n )=1.03651198 × exp(-0.03586121059 × n).
if we consider that there are still a 100 players, we can guess the total number of viewers by simply summing the 100 first values given by f( n ) (basically, we sum f( n ) for n going from 1 to 100).
the result is around 26.
Therefore, if the number of viewers in function of the ranking is determined by an exponential function, and that there are 100 concurrent streams (/otherworlders), we can guess that there are at least 26 billions concurrent viewers on Earth. The Earth population is greater than or equal to 26 billions.
the mathematical representation can also be given by a sequence, but i was too lazy and after all, a function defined on N is basically the same in this case (there was no need to use any kind of recurrency)
The problem with all of this is that this series already established at the beginning in chapter 1 that the population of earth was around 7 billion. The author literally just picked a number out of their ass and called it a day for the viewer count.let's study this case. we assume that ppl cannot watch multiple streams at the same time.
let's represent the number of viewers (IN BILLIONS) by position in ranking by a function. let's simply guess it is an exponential function, bc i said so: f( n )=a * exp(b * n) (with n in N*, and a,b in R).
aka:
N*→R+
n→a × exp(b × n)
we know that: f(0)=1 and f(32)=0.329
using an application for this kind of shit (personally used Numworks), we have:
f( n )=1.03651198 × exp(-0.03586121059 × n).
if we consider that there are still a 100 players, we can guess the total number of viewers by simply summing the 100 first values given by f( n ) (basically, we sum f( n ) for n going from 1 to 100).
the result is around 26.
Therefore, if the number of viewers in function of the ranking is determined by an exponential function, and that there are 100 concurrent streams (/otherworlders), we can guess that there are at least 26 billions concurrent viewers on Earth. The Earth population is greater than or equal to 26 billions.
the mathematical representation can also be given by a sequence, but i was too lazy and after all, a function defined on N is basically the same in this case (there was no need to use any kind of recurrency)
according to author's ass calculations, you are indeed correct.The problem with all of this is that this series already established at the beginning in chapter 1 that the population of earth was around 7 billion. The author literally just picked a number out of their ass and called it a day for the viewer count.