【Oshi no Ko】 - Ch. 160 - EYE

Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
4,803
It feels like Aka just recorded his thought process the moment he remembered that there was an idol element to this manga.
 
Supporter
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Messages
95
Tricky moral debate. Who’s worse? Someone Who kills a single person or someone who’s convinced others to kill several?

morally, I could probably justify it by claiming that he’s a threat to others and killing him would save other lives from being destroyed (including my own sister) but it’s still a bit tricky
From a purely moral (read subjectiv) standpoint, I’d say intentions put Aqua firmly on the “right” side. If Kamiki is responsible for those deaths then he’s also firmly responsible for Aqua killing him, albeit not on purpose.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
829
he will not do it because Aka is afraid of the majority of the fans but ill be a lil hopefull still
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
129
Holy fuck. Those dialogues are just… not it.

I'm a sucker for edgy shits, and I love when stuffs go philosophical or something, but the writing in this chapter is just... I mean, it's been ass for while but this chapter especially is.

Well, this shit might indeed be so ass, but Mengo's art is just godly nevertheless.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
770
I think aqua will disfigure the guy without killing him, so he can't manipulate people anymore. This being a cautionary tale: don't be ugly looking.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
448
Tricky moral debate. Who’s worse? Someone Who kills a single person or someone who’s convinced others to kill several?

morally, I could probably justify it by claiming that he’s a threat to others and killing him would save other lives from being destroyed (including my own sister) but it’s still a bit tricky
Kamiki killed Yura though.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
770
Tricky moral debate. Who’s worse? Someone Who kills a single person or someone who’s convinced others to kill several?

morally, I could probably justify it by claiming that he’s a threat to others and killing him would save other lives from being destroyed (including my own sister) but it’s still a bit tricky
Its not a tricky moral debate, they are both crimes. One is murder and the other is incitement to murder or conspiracy to commit murder. Like Charles Manson. "under the joint responsibility rule, which allows for conviction of conspiracy to commit murder and for the murders themselves by way of directing others to carry them out"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top