I can't tell if the author isn't actually that committed to what this manga could mean or what, but it just seems there's a bias with fallacy in this manga. They kind of presented a slippery slope, "oh sorry, young girls depicted in any way in anything are banned from now on. Looks like, a lot of the readers now will instead turn to actually commiting their fantasies in reality instead". This kind of implies that these rules shouldn't be implemented. I can't really put my finger on what I mean to say, I mean the "depicted in any way" part is ridiculous and objectively stupid when the always problem of the majority is not just "any depiction" but sexualization that are useless to the story. So with that donut part, it kind of feels like the author would blame society when it's really the fault of the manga industry. Well it is "comedy" but content related to controversial concepts can produce conflicted and undecided thoughts without much difficulty. This is just a civil take of mine and I don't care much since it is supposedly a "comedy", have a good day.
