Question/Quote of The Day

[gimme_yuri_plz]

QoTD 75: Cut or uncut?

QoTD 75.5: Do you prefer short kings, or towering giants?
Towering giant futa that can break my back.

What?

 

[DavidianMillerian]

This is nonsense, i'll abstain. But maybe @DavidianMillerian can answer some of these.

WTF WHY ME WHAT DID I DO

 

[Takane-Da]

Thanks for 2,000 messages

QoTD 75: Cut or uncut?
QoTD 75.5: Do you prefer short kings, or towering giants?
For the female audience: just imagine that you're a futa or something
For the moderators: gimme_mercy_plz

Congratulations on reaching 2,000 messages.

75: I think uncut? I like some of the scenes that were cut by the director. Like in The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies extended edition. Me love big army battle.

75.5: No preference.

 

[JustASpider]

QoTD 75: Cut or uncut?
QoTD 75.5: Do you prefer short kings, or towering giants?

Don't care. I would not know what it would be like with another significantly taller than me, but boy does my imagination enjoy the idea.

 

[gimme_yuri_plz]

QoTD 75: Cut or uncut?

My god! I need to take my head out of the gutter. I thought you were talking about circumcision

 

[Dverin_Oshiban_Duren]

...does this mean your... thing regenerates?!?

Isn't that how it works for everyone? Unless you bald.
Looks like you got some well-deserved correction for not being creative enough lol

Let me give you a tip: In Lord of Mysteries, the Black Emperor pathway is about working around existing order, becoming a shadow of order and distorting things to make them fit your own order.
Since you only have to include the topic or just the word, use something like "the pen is mightier than the sword" or change the subject to biology, history, etc. and ask a related question.

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

QoTD 75.5: Do you prefer short kings, or towering giants?
For the female audience: just imagine that you're a futa or something

again with the ambiguous intent due to illiteracy and an inability to get your point across through text.

@yogurtman250 your question mentions "short kings" which obviously means men. contrast that with "towering giants" implies that the giants are also men. so it sounds like you're asking the women here if they prefer short or giant men. yet the line below it says "for the female audience:", indicating that the above question was meant for the male audience? and what is the question even asking? is it asking what you'd prefer in a partner, or what you'd prefer to be yourself? "for the female audience:" could lead one to believe that the question is asking the men which one they'd prefer to be, rather than which one they'd prefer in a partner. on the other hand, it's also possible that the question was indeed meant to ask men whether they prefer short or tall women, and the term "short king" was simply incorrectly placed (since the term only refers to men). this possibility is also reinforced by the contrasting of a "female audience" below the question itself. as for the "imagine that you're a futa or something," that could mean either that the women are meant to imagine they are futas so that they could choose whether to be a 'short king' or 'towering giant' OR it could mean that the women are to imagine themselves as futas so that they could give their preference on short or tall women. regardless, none if it really makes sense, and this kind of shit is actually getting on my nerves. if you're incapable of writing a few unambiguous sentences due to sheer incompetence, then please seek out the help of an A.I. to proofread your questions before you post them. it's really not difficult, yet you've done this multiple times now.

 

[yogurtman250]

again with the ambiguous intent due to illiteracy and an inability to get your point across through text.

Do you REALLY want me to be unambiguous on the fucking penis question of all things??
I get the other points though

 

[bigtiddyoneesan]

Do you REALLY want me to be unambiguous on the fucking penis question of all things??

i do, and after thinking about the QotD for the past three hours, i also realized what the intent behind it was.

"short kings" refers to small penises (instead of height), and "towering giants" refers to large penises. the "for the female audience: just imagine that you're a futa or something" comment falls in line with that completely, as women do not have penises, so they'd just have to 'imagine' being futas.

however, i think it's clear that the QotD was still extremely ambiguous, as none of the responses i saw picked up on that.

 

[yogurtman250]

i do, and after thinking about the QotD for the past three hours, i also realized what the intent behind it was.

"short kings" refers to small penises (instead of height), and "towering giants" refers to large penises. the "for the female audience: just imagine that you're a futa or something" comment falls in line with that completely, as women do not have penises, so they'd just have to 'imagine' being futas.

however, i think it's clear that the QotD was still extremely ambiguous, as none of the responses i saw picked up on that.

Sorry about that, the question was intentionally vague out of fear of the mods finding out. Not to mention, I didn't want to weird out more people than I already have with yesterday's question.
also the answers are pretty funny soooo

 

[panzerkampfwagyu]

I personally find this entire discourse about being cut on your wangadoodle or making a ranking system on the size rather pointless, given that none of them correlate to how good one in bed is.
Dick size also mostly is important if compared to vaj-jay-jay size, as too big differences there mostly cause problems, so big hyper weapons aren't that good if there is a small cooch slit.
Cutting for nonmedical reasons is extremely weird and those that worship it are weirdos, in my humble opinion.