@Podi125
*Your claim of an Empress or legal wife being being treasonous is false * yawns*. It was socially acceptable for people of this time period to hate concubine/mistress/ sex slaves whatever the term is depending on the nation. Unmarried woman, even those who were mistress of Emperor were culturally shamed around the world and most eventually had to leave court. This should be obvious by the fact that there is a well known word for “loose woman” slut and not a well known one for men. In addition to the fact that most mistress who did get the king or Emperor power did last . . like Poor Ann Boylin that got beheaded.
*Marrying into the royal family makes a person be considered a royal. That what makes her an Empress. That’s what the world means. [a la the definition….
em·press
/ˈemprəs/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: empress; plural noun: empresses
a woman who is a sovereign ruler of great power and rank, especially one ruling an empire.
"Queen Victoria was proclaimed Empress at Delhi in 1877"
* Making the Emperor look bad isn’t really bad for business clearly you still don’t know how a monarchy works. Assentation to the throne is based on marriage and blood. There are numerous rulers through out history that are not good rulers but it has 0% do with them being crowned. It has always been about blood and family linage , that’s why babies and children even though their clearly were not able to lead their people got crowned . People with crippling birth defects that effect their cognitive abilities like King Tut of Egypt and the Halsingborg royal family get crowned.[ fun fact: the birth defects were due to constant incest]
*yawn* sorry history is still proving you wrong.
She can do all things I said she could do, strange how you are still ignoring those points. Overthrowing someone isn't the only way to gain more power, again that's not how politics work.
If you reply to an ongoing conversation, its your fault if you didn’t read all of it. Everything I said is recorded in the chat, and the fact that @ someone makes it clear that its an ongoing conversation. The messages are not hidden, their were only 2 that I made before you messaged me. All open to the public there is no way you couldn’t see it.
*edited*
* I do agree that people shouldn't take what they see on TV at face value, but when it comes to something as irrelevant as politics from a different era who tf cares if people are misunderstanding things?
yeah this why I presumed you were being racist. Its not that random at all considering its relevant to the story. Considering how you conveniently ignored my historical examples that are relevant to the topic because you “didn’t see” even though my post was public make your state "seem* purposefully ignorant. Also Monarchies still exist and several monarchies did things that effect the way the world works today that's why its relevant. Europe and Africa have very different history, that historical ignorance making you think these are equal just adds to my point. Do you know any of the pre-existing effects of what countries like Great Britain did today that effect countries like India or Ghana that effect things today ? You must live somewhere very privileged if you have zero inclination on why so many education system in various countries around the world still teach past and present governmental systems and social system.