i'm curious, what type of job can you get with a music degree? also is music theory hard to learn?Largely useless fact from my music degree that's somehow relevant here: non-English solfege systems use 'si' for the 7th scale degree rather than 'ti' - I would hazard a guess that's where the Japanese syllable came from.
Thanks for the chapter!
Well, if I was trying to use my degree (BA with an emphasis in composition), the answer would be 'teaching music' and that's about it (composition isn't a job, it's an illness). I don't do that - the only thing the degree has formally gotten me for employment is the ability to say I have the degree - but informally I have no regrets about spending four years learning about a topic that interests me and that I enjoy.i'm curious, what type of job can you get with a music degree? also is music theory hard to learn?
interesting, can you also become a conductor with that knowledge? or do you need a specialized degree for that?Well, if I was trying to use my degree (BA with an emphasis in composition), the answer would be 'teaching music' and that's about it (composition isn't a job, it's an illness). I don't do that - the only thing the degree has formally gotten me for employment is the ability to say I have the degree - but informally I have no regrets about spending four years learning about a topic that interests me and that I enjoy.
Music theory isn't hard, but like most systematic approaches to a subject, it does require a base set of knowledge/terminology to start from, and acquiring that base without the benefit of something like piano lessons is kind of hard. I think that's what threw most of the folks I went to school with that had trouble with the topic. Some folks were vocal or wind majors that weren't accustomed to thinking of more than their individual line, and dealing with multiple notes at once was a new experience. Others had learned to do a lot of things by ear, and so trying to give names to some of the things they already 'knew' was the big stumbling block. Finally, a lot of theory ties back into Baroque/Classical harmony, and starts to break down as you move through the Romantic era and into the 20th Century (both for high art music and popular music), so there is a certain amount of 'when are we going to use this' for some folks.
Conducting is related - I did take a semester of it (required for the composition emphasis - I think I still have my baton around somewhere), and know enough about it to realize it's a lot harder than it looks. I could rehearse a group on short notice, at least on a piece I'm familiar with, but it would take a lot of time to get to where anyone professional would want me to be leading performances. Most conductors for professional ensembles will probably have at least a masters-level graduate degree focusing on conducting, but I would guess most high school orchestra/band/choir directors or community ensemble directors are like me - they had a semester or two of conducting as part of their degree - with the added benefit of the time they've spent actually conducting over their career.interesting, can you also become a conductor with that knowledge? or do you need a specialized degree for that?
for me musical knowledge and creating music fascinates me, there are times that I wish I could've gotten a degree in music/arts rather than in STEM
Well, if I was trying to use my degree (BA with an emphasis in composition), the answer would be 'teaching music' and that's about it (composition isn't a job, it's an illness). I don't do that - the only thing the degree has formally gotten me for employment is the ability to say I have the degree - but informally I have no regrets about spending four years learning about a topic that interests me and that I enjoy.
Music theory isn't hard, but like most systematic approaches to a subject, it does require a base set of knowledge/terminology to start from, and acquiring that base without the benefit of something like piano lessons is kind of hard. I think that's what threw most of the folks I went to school with that had trouble with the topic. Some folks were vocal or wind majors that weren't accustomed to thinking of more than their individual line, and dealing with multiple notes at once was a new experience. Others had learned to do a lot of things by ear, and so trying to give names to some of the things they already 'knew' was the big stumbling block. Finally, a lot of theory ties back into Baroque/Classical harmony, and starts to break down as you move through the Romantic era and into the 20th Century (both for high art music and popular music), so there is a certain amount of 'when are we going to use this' for some folks.
Blame the English for that one. "We can't have two note names starting with the same letter. That's madness!"also, i have literally never heard anyone refer to "Si" as "Ti".
You're about 75% of the way there - at this point it would just be learning some terms and fitting pieces together, and then you could sail through about three semesters of theory in short order.(...) I can play all the scales, know all the 7ths and inversions, but once you start getting into the chord progressions, it all falls apart (it feels so subjective sometimes).
(...) Studying the Bach Chorales helped with this, but there's still so many questions I have that I can never answer on my own.