Surprised there wouldn't be a tragedy tag, i can understand them starting to get closer to another person but would've also expected her to also have some kinda failsafe code word to make her just stop functioningYandere lesbians but also the human girl was a bitch for doing that so I don’t feel that bad
Remember y’all, regardless of if their an android or an human you still need to communicate.
i mean normally robots don't 'love' either, tho she should've just had it programmed to be 'unconditional' versus jealousy or so but i'm sure some ppl would enjoy a potential polycule or ppl being 'ok' with ntr when it's still all yuri lolWhat happened to the 3 laws of robotics? Was she too lazy to code those in too?
Asimov's laws were fundamentally flawed and this could have been a good example of such. She didn't harm her, she fixed her. The flaws in those laws are literally a part of the story that originates them. I wish they were less popular in sci-fi, or at least not presented as being good so often, but most people haven't even read I, Robot so what can we do. The simplest additional rule that would have fixed this is "A robot may never defy a human, unless the order violates the other laws or violates the orders of it's owner and is not from it's owner". There is no reason for Marie to not obey orders, like being told to stop.For a genius scientist she sure does some dumb things. You created a robot that can actually kill people? I guess people forgot about Asimov and his three laws of robotics. Also since the robot is basically human and can love like a human acting so callously towards them is pretty heartless.
Yeah the OG laws are flawed and plenty of thinkers tweaked their wording or introduced a law 0 and such. Honestly, the more you think about the setting the less sense it makes. This genius creator makes a super advanced robot and desperately tries to get recognition, but she never actually showed off her lovebot to anyone.Asimov's laws were fundamentally flawed and this could have been a good example of such. She didn't harm her, she fixed her. The flaws in those laws are literally a part of the story that originates them. I wish they were less popular in sci-fi, or at least not presented as being good so often, but most people haven't even read I, Robot so what can we do. The simplest additional rule that would have fixed this is "A robot may never defy a human, unless the order violates the other laws or violates the orders of it's owner and is not from it's owner". There is no reason for Marie to not obey orders, like being told to stop.
Anyway I'm more wondering about the world, where Kei can make AI and a robot this advanced yet is needing to market her skills. She says she's "a few decades too early" which implies this is extremely advanced tech, but there's no way it would be difficult to sell this tech. And if the tech is that expensive how the hell did she afford the research? And the materials to build Marie? All of that is less believable than lovebot9000 killing it's owner.