Didn't expect to see the Rape of Nanjing mentioned directly, even though it's 1 paragraph with a footnote saying that people have different opinions on it.
Makes sense, since the author cares about the plight of the Chinese at the time, and to gloss over or sugarcoat such a monumental act of evil by the Japanese army would stand against everything that has been shown thus far. Reading the details of the massacre first time genuinely made my stomach turn.