S-Kyuu Boukensha ga Ayumu Michi: Tsuihou Sareta Shounen wa Shin no Nouryoku 'Buki Master' de Sekai Saikyou ni Itaru - Ch. 4.2

Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Messages
2
I don't even know why I'm reading this,I think is because of the Guns but man the main character are just forced to be edgy which is not great, also is the guns are just infinite that it doesn't need to be reloaded?
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Messages
2
This premise is so damn interesting, I'm not much for isekai but it's nice the protag isn't from another world, and isn't super generic looking either. The setup up to now has been really good. I wouldn't be surprised at all if this got an anime.
The Protag is literally look like Hajime Nagumo from Arifureta what do you mean isn't super generic? It's literally the most generic main character in Isekai story.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
4,019
Breed. I mean breed. I mean bread, turn her into breeding stock, i mean turn her into bread.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Messages
349
Rather it feels like the interpretation of him being a villain that uses even demons is some weird negative representation of what was a genuinely good philosophy for the time. He was willing to use or put into positions of authority anyone or anything as long as they were effective/useful, traditions or background be damned. Hence, Hideyoshi or Yasuke, didn't matter if you were a peasant, slave, or whatever, if you could do the job he'd take you and that honestly makes him a better guy than the other warlords slaughtering for conquest.

He was called Demon Lord of Owari by his peers because he massacred several thousands of women and children at Mt.Hiei. Not because they didnt "like" his meritocratic philosophy. Nobunaga was ruthless to the extreme towards his "enemies" even by that times standard. Sure he could promote his own peasants to higher positions but he would slaughter other peasants for the simple reason of them having the "wrong" lord, something that by the way they had 0 control over.

This take is as stupid as calling Chingis Khan a great guy for his meritocratic philosophy.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
1,401
He was called Demon Lord of Owari by his peers because he massacred several thousands of women and children at Mt.Hiei. Not because they didnt "like" his meritocratic philosophy. Nobunaga was ruthless to the extreme towards his "enemies" even by that times standard. Sure he could promote his own peasants to higher positions but he would slaughter other peasants for the simple reason of them having the "wrong" lord, something that by the way they had 0 control over.

This take is as stupid as calling Chingis Khan a great guy for his meritocratic philosophy.
I'm aware, however, which of the warlords did not kill peasants? I'm speaking in terms of the time period and his peers. Most historical leaders were a shitshow. I can talk about the good of FDR's economic policies as well as condemn his internment camps.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Messages
349
I'm aware, however, which of the warlords did not kill peasants? I'm speaking in terms of the time period and his peers. Most historical leaders were a shitshow. I can talk about the good of FDR's economic policies as well as condemn his internment camps.

Other warlords never genocided whole religous and/or ethnic settlements down to the last child. No matter what "good" deeds poeple like Nobunaga actually did will never shake off the Extreme ruthlessness, blood and death they actually gave the world. Sure Chingis Khan promoted a sort of religous freedom, but he also left piles of hundreds of thousands dead innocent children in his wake. Sure the Assyrians of Iron Age united a broken region after the bronze age collapsed, but they did so by burning whole cities with its inhabitens to the ground. And i dont need to get into silly mustash man now do i?

Forces like this will never be as "good" as their peers by the sheer notions of their ruthlessness. They are the closest we have in human history of "Evil personified".
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
1,401
Other warlords never genocided whole religous and/or ethnic settlements down to the last child. No matter what "good" deeds poeple like Nobunaga actually did will never shake off the Extreme ruthlessness, blood and death they actually gave the world. Sure Chingis Khan promoted a sort of religous freedom, but he also left piles of hundreds of thousands dead innocent children in his wake. Sure the Assyrians of Iron Age united a broken region after the bronze age collapsed, but they did so by burning whole cities with its inhabitens to the ground. And i dont need to get into silly mustash man now do i?

Forces like this will never be as "good" as their peers by the sheer notions of their ruthlessness. They are the closest we have in human history of "Evil personified".
...yeah, I'm going to have to accept that I got carried away with an idea, overstepped, and need to walk away with the loss on this one...not worth trying to argue 'the massacre wasn't really that bad' just to not say I'm wrong.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
4,159
I tried to figure out what this meant and I found this on a MAL forum. The "strong emphasis" does fit.

"nanoja" = An exaggeration on how old people say "na no da," which is a clause added to the end of a sentence, essentially fulfilling the same role as "yo" does, in that it's a strong emphasis on what you've just said. (e.g. "Yuusuke wa yappari hannin na no da!" = "Yuusuke really was the culprit after all!")
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Messages
349
...yeah, I'm going to have to accept that I got carried away with an idea, overstepped, and need to walk away with the loss on this one...not worth trying to argue 'the massacre wasn't really that bad' just to not say I'm wrong.

Much respect to you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top