Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2023
- Messages
- 914
Haha, THANKS A LOT FOR THE TRANSLATIONS.
3rd person laying down is?View attachment 12678
EDIT : I am warning you guys, if you do not want to get spoiled do not go further into this comment section. Some people really just don't give a flip lol.
I don't even know why I'm reading this,I think is because of the Guns but man the main character are just forced to be edgy which is not great, also is the guns are just infinite that it doesn't need to be reloaded?
The Protag is literally look like Hajime Nagumo from Arifureta what do you mean isn't super generic? It's literally the most generic main character in Isekai story.This premise is so damn interesting, I'm not much for isekai but it's nice the protag isn't from another world, and isn't super generic looking either. The setup up to now has been really good. I wouldn't be surprised at all if this got an anime.
Rather it feels like the interpretation of him being a villain that uses even demons is some weird negative representation of what was a genuinely good philosophy for the time. He was willing to use or put into positions of authority anyone or anything as long as they were effective/useful, traditions or background be damned. Hence, Hideyoshi or Yasuke, didn't matter if you were a peasant, slave, or whatever, if you could do the job he'd take you and that honestly makes him a better guy than the other warlords slaughtering for conquest.
I'm aware, however, which of the warlords did not kill peasants? I'm speaking in terms of the time period and his peers. Most historical leaders were a shitshow. I can talk about the good of FDR's economic policies as well as condemn his internment camps.He was called Demon Lord of Owari by his peers because he massacred several thousands of women and children at Mt.Hiei. Not because they didnt "like" his meritocratic philosophy. Nobunaga was ruthless to the extreme towards his "enemies" even by that times standard. Sure he could promote his own peasants to higher positions but he would slaughter other peasants for the simple reason of them having the "wrong" lord, something that by the way they had 0 control over.
This take is as stupid as calling Chingis Khan a great guy for his meritocratic philosophy.
I'm aware, however, which of the warlords did not kill peasants? I'm speaking in terms of the time period and his peers. Most historical leaders were a shitshow. I can talk about the good of FDR's economic policies as well as condemn his internment camps.
...yeah, I'm going to have to accept that I got carried away with an idea, overstepped, and need to walk away with the loss on this one...not worth trying to argue 'the massacre wasn't really that bad' just to not say I'm wrong.Other warlords never genocided whole religous and/or ethnic settlements down to the last child. No matter what "good" deeds poeple like Nobunaga actually did will never shake off the Extreme ruthlessness, blood and death they actually gave the world. Sure Chingis Khan promoted a sort of religous freedom, but he also left piles of hundreds of thousands dead innocent children in his wake. Sure the Assyrians of Iron Age united a broken region after the bronze age collapsed, but they did so by burning whole cities with its inhabitens to the ground. And i dont need to get into silly mustash man now do i?
Forces like this will never be as "good" as their peers by the sheer notions of their ruthlessness. They are the closest we have in human history of "Evil personified".
You know, like when something really exciting or the climax is about to happen and you just end it. Edging everyone and me💀🙏 Edging goated
...yeah, I'm going to have to accept that I got carried away with an idea, overstepped, and need to walk away with the loss on this one...not worth trying to argue 'the massacre wasn't really that bad' just to not say I'm wrong.