If MC kill him earlier then what? Do you think Azel the only pawn the nobles has? Do you think the noble will stop trying to destoy the city because Azel is dead? I think not.
I mean, this logical fallacy is so overused; simular to claiming that you "can't drive because there will be a red light at some point," this is the perfect example of how to allow fascism and dictatorship: giving in to apathy, and encouraging others to do so.
Funny thing is, this type of comment was pumped out (with different nouns) a thousand times a day across every media platform from February 2022 until November 2024. While that makes it difficult to stomach such words, it makes one wonder about the origins...
But hey! At least you won't argue, right?
Since the entire point of your argument is that a person should immediately give up and allow harm to befall everyone else, because they might not immediately solve every problem on the planet.
... which is a rather bold (if dumb) claim; but, if you do believe it, and your entire series of comments aren't actually just a troll, you should give up commenting, because nobody with even the slightest sense of self worth is going to agree.
So, since you believe in giving up immediately upon experiencing difficulties, you should give up commenting.
So it was the second case.
I knew that MC would have been unable tokil lhim, no matter what.
Author decided to make him a true piece of shit, pretending stuff until the end.
The power destroyed his body, he would have got kilel dlater anyway, but the problem for me is that MC wanted to save him.