Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2018
- Messages
- 145
ah yes textbook definitions because meaning is always static in the words we use.
go home your drunk.
ah yes textbook definitions because meaning is always static in the words we use.
"A few unsavory things" manhwa-freaks actively ruin series though, with actually dogshit translations that almost make MTL look high quality, awful unnecessary censoring, and constant begging for money. I am honestly surprised they havent gotten the ban hammer yet cuz I swear theyve at least broken some site rule before.Can we maybe not ban the people translating the series just because they do a few unsavory things? Thanks.
and the result of this was... the dragon NOT immediately killing the downed allies? Will could've just pulled off a successful bluff (bluffing that he doesn't care about the lives of his allies). Or does the dragon have some reason to not kill them?
I hate that the dragon didn't follow through on its threat. Not that I want the others to die, but the mantra of "As long as one of us stands we still win" rings hollow if no one actually loses anything. Like, why did the dragon not immediately crush them when he said no? From the dragons perspective, it has every reason to. They have no more use and crushing them can demoralize his Will.
or we can do that and let literally anyone else pick up this gold mineCan we maybe not ban the people translating the series just because they do a few unsavory things? Thanks.
I was thinking the same and googled it. Dictionary meaning #3,Did I read this wrong or is this meant to mean flounder with an L, please?
While that might be true in normal combat, that's not really how this scene is framed. The dragon doesn't fear Will. He doesn't have a reason to fear his rage, and Will has explicitly expressed that he will not be saving them if it means he can kill Valacirca. They're also very clearly not all unconscious so can still pose a threat themselves.The dead is casualty, but the injured is liability. Even though Will said he trusted his comrade's resolve, as long as they're still alive he'll be mindful of their state, and his action will be somewhat restricted. If Valacirca killed them right away, not only it would completely free Will's hands, it might even give him a fighting boost (via rage and thirst for revenge).
Also, giving a sliver of hope then crushing it sounds like the kind of sick entertainment that the dragon enjoyed.
Words do actually have meanings, that's their purpose, to convey a concept or describe a thing. You can use context for clues about what they mean specifically. For example, Scamwhafucks explicitly state they are "hiring" translators and also asking for volunteers for other tasks. This implies that the other jobs are not for pay.ah yes textbook definitions because meaning is always static in the words we use.
go home your drunk.
You're giving them way too much credit when it's far more likely given their shit translations that Scamwhafucks are just MTL'ing everything and pocketing the money.They only paid translator? I think thats what they mean.. idk..
This reminds me of MangaDemon.You're giving them way too much credit when it's far more likely given their shit translations that Scamwhafucks are just MTL'ing everything and pocketing the money.
if not for Frieren or Helck, this would be definitely the fantasy manga of the decade
My guess is simply that taking the couple of seconds to kill them would mean leaving himself open to a retaliatory strike from Will, and he sees that as a bigger threat than anything they could do from their current position.does the dragon have some reason to not kill them?
It's kinda an archaic usage, but "founder" can actually mean "fail/collapse/give out".Did I read this wrong or is this meant to mean flounder with an L, please?