Eh... sorry i don't have the energy to keep the debate went on longer. Don't make your own interpretation with your experience in reading all of that changes the critical thinking of what should be the realest truth. Hero is hero. It's a prestige title that should be respected by people whatever writing the author want it be. If there is some author that have a contrary idea, they better bring a more engaging plot instead of easier way to depict 'kingdom is bad, people is corrupt, hero should suffer'. Simple thinking like this is shallow and not implying anything to the reader. It would just imply the author didn't do his research in presenting his own terms in his own story