Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 3,886
No? How something is subverted is important. What the butt of the joke is is important (no pun intended). Parodying a nasty thing isn't carte blanche for anything you have to say on the subject.
If anything, I think I might find this somewhat more inherently-offensive than what it's parodying. The culture around rape kinks like this is most-often broadly repugnant in practice for obvious reasons but... up to a point, so long as it's kept in fiction, and if it's understood at a deep level that it would be wrong in reality but is a private fictional indulgence for people who are into that, most-ideally with surrounding discussions about how to keep fiction separate from reality and the importance of keeping from objectifying people in reality, it's at least possible to for people to approach the matter relatively-healthily and without hurting anyone or spreading harm.
(Which is basically just an elaborate, thought-through and codified version of "don't kink-shame".)
Whereas this seemingly encapsulates a worldview in its one joke, and that apparent worldview is utterly crass and vile.
Last edited:
