Tensei Mae wa Otoko Datta no de Gyaku Harem wa Okotowari Shite Orimasu - Vol. 3 Ch. 11

[Karinkishi]

The left one is Yuri author(its not a romance story) with story based on christina and MC
The middle one is BL author(its not a romance story) with story based on Rio and MC
The right one can copy writing style but always add +18 stuff

Idk how to add image

 

[monkey123]

YURI!!!!

 

[Hikineet]

Thanks for the chapter.

 

[TheLaidBackMan]

What does this one give off to you?
I'm marking it as spoiler as it is from the next chapter but, it doesn't give any context or whatsoever.

Spoiler

View attachment 21576

Without context, I can see 3 possibilities, she's:

1. Angry
2. Upset
3. Disappointed

 

[xironi]

 

[mahtan]

"They aren't found of girls developing that way"
Yeah, I bet the men of any society wouldn't be fond of having their women putting themselves in harm ways having to work in dangerous jobs with really high injure/fatality rates, especially in a period of time were medicine is undeveloped and even a simple scratch could means the death of the person.
That is even just danger on the job but there is also the danger of being in the area of the job were wild beats or even other humans could pose a threat to these women.
I get this is a shoujo and "female power" message is to be expected but sometimes they are so divorced from reality that it just doesn't vibe well, especially when the MC is supposed to be someone from our modern world and should know better.

 

[Mussthemoose]

And so GL defeats BL in this round

 

[gr2222]

"They aren't found of girls developing that way"
Yeah, I bet the men of any society wouldn't be fond of having their women putting themselves in harm ways having to work in dangerous jobs with really high injure/fatality rates, especially in a period of time were medicine is undeveloped and even a simple scratch could means the death of the person.
That is even just danger on the job but there is also the danger of being in the area of the job were wild beats or even other humans could pose a threat to these women.
I get this is a shoujo and "female power" message is to be expected but sometimes they are so divorced from reality that it just doesn't vibe well, especially when the MC is supposed to be someone from our modern world and should know better.

It's not a shoujo, it's a seinen though, even the reverse harem is kind of a lie (the only reason the web novel has it, is mostly because of jokes.) but any way the novel also has BL and GL tag (obviously). For some reason it was falsely tagged as shoujo before on mangadex, but everywhere else i had checked it was (and still is) marked as Seinen. just check the bookwalker link.

And no, it's not about a female power message. if it was the mc wouldn't have been a man back in japan.

Also what do you mean with the 'It's so divorced from reality'? you know that the story takes place in a 16th century Europe-like world right? you know that the things with women writing and reading books related to politics and such, and woman riding horses where not really allowed but that was the period that it started to change right? if I am not mistaken only few woman were allowed to ride horses in that period.

 

[Melgan]

This is such a wonderful story. Truly, the best thing about humans is their creativity.

 

[mahtan]

It's not a shoujo, it's a seinen though, even the reverse harem is kind of a lie (the only reason the web novel has it, is mostly because of jokes.) but any way the novel also has BL and GL tag (obviously). For some reason it was falsely tagged as shoujo before on mangadex, but everywhere else i had checked it was (and still is) marked as Seinen. just check the bookwalker link.

And no, it's not about a female power message. if it was the mc wouldn't have been a man back in japan.

Also what do you mean with the 'It's so divorced from reality'? you know that the story takes place in a 16th century Europe-like world right? you know that the things with women writing and reading books related to politics and such, and woman riding horses where not really allowed but that was the period that it started to change right? if I am not mistaken only few woman were allowed to ride horses in that period.

The perception of those times are very distorted for the general public because of media, that is why you believe "only few woman were allowed to ride horses in that period" as that is not true.
There are always social norms and group pressure for certain activities but there was never a notion of it being "forbidden", uncouth or not lady like maybe but not forbidden. Remember that the plebe didn't had the time to worry about those kind of things and very little people, other than nobles, even had horses in those times to begin with. There are register of ladies who would hunt, ladies that worked as soldiers and knights (actual ones not myths or martyrs), ladies that worked in commerce and even in mines.
If you think you know something about how the 16th century in our world worked without having gone out of your way to study that time period from documents and journals from that time period I will tell you that you don't really know it because of how romanticized and cherry picked information from those times is used and passed to the general population.

 

[Ahodegozaimasuru]

REJECT YAOI
EMBRACE YURI

Embrace all romance for the ultimate balance

...maybe except incest

 

[gr2222]

The perception of those times are very distorted for the general public because of media, that is why you believe "only few woman were allowed to ride horses in that period" as that is not true.
There are always social norms and group pressure for certain activities but there was never a notion of it being "forbidden", uncouth or not lady like maybe but not forbidden. Remember that the plebe didn't had the time to worry about those kind of things and very little people, other than nobles, even had horses in those times to begin with. There are register of ladies who would hunt, ladies that worked as soldiers and knights (actual ones not myths or martyrs), ladies that worked in commerce and even in mines.
If you think you know something about how the 16th century in our world worked without having gone out of your way to study that time period from documents and journals from that time period I will tell you that you don't really know it because of how romanticized and cherry picked information from those times is used and passed to the general population.

1% IS FEW. we are talking about high society here, women were mostly tools, and they were not really allowed to be taught to ride horses, keep in mind that 'not really allowed' in this situation means that they were not expected to do so, it wasn't law, but people thought that woman riding horses was un-needed, and the woman that wanted it would be laughed at.

But I didn't talk only about just riding horses. Women were really not allowed to read and write books with politics, I mean they weren't even allowed to have pockets so they wouldn't be carrying weapons or poisons. Even in 16th century noble women were mostly tools.

I live in Europe, specifically in Greece, you don't get to say I don't know about it when even middle schools teach those things here. And you are saying that you studied from documents and journals? yes woman did occasionally work in jobs that men did, who denied that? but they were looked down upon, and they were way too few, we are talking about less then even 0.1% of people working those jobs being woman. But as I said, we are talking about high society here. and the things I said remain true. nobles didn't like their woman riding horses, and reading/writing political books.

 

[mahtan]

Embrace all romance for the ultimate balance

...maybe except incest

And pedophilia...

 

[mahtan]

1% IS FEW. we are talking about high society here, women were mostly tools, and they were not really allowed to be taught to ride horses, keep in mind that 'not really allowed' in this situation means that they were not expected to do so, it wasn't law, but people thought that woman riding horses was un-needed, and the woman that wanted it would be laughed at.

But I didn't talk only about just riding horses. Women were really not allowed to read and write books with politics, I mean they weren't even allowed to have pockets so they wouldn't be carrying weapons or poisons. Even in 16th century noble women were mostly tools.

I live in Europe, specifically in Greece, you don't get to say I don't know about it when even middle schools teach those things here. And you are saying that you studied from documents and journals? yes woman did occasionally work in jobs that men did, who denied that? but they were looked down upon, and they were way too few, we are talking about less then even 0.1% of people working those jobs being woman. But as I said, we are talking about high society here. and the things I said remain true. nobles didn't like their woman riding horses, and reading/writing political books.

You living wherever has nothing to do with knowledge of something, especially when you are purposely taught wrong about it.

I am not here to convince anyone, your position is wrong and only exist in stories misrepresenting the time period.
You agreement was never required.

 

[gr2222]

You living wherever has nothing to do with knowledge of something, especially when you are purposely taught wrong about it.

I am not here to convince anyone, your position is wrong and only exist in stories misrepresenting the time period.
You agreement was never required.

Then name me a single source that proves me wrong, a single historical document or anything. If you find anything proving that most noble men were fine with noble woman riding horses in western Europe before the 15th-17th century. Or just a single one of my other points.

Also where I live is very much important, for example most Americans know less of their own history than Europeans do, because in most European countries actually have better education systems. And from what I have seen it's mostly American media that lie about history for political gains. But when it comes to information I don't trust any media anyways, do you know what I trust? history books written using many sources that were written at the time it is based on, and having notes of things that might be inaccurate and having notes that there is too little information for something to be confirmed. And those books also have all sources listed at the end. Those were the kind of history books we learned from.

 

[LoliNecromancer]

Shlick shlick.