You're howling at the moon. Authors don't do any research even about the sole topic their work revolves around anymore. There are manga about blacksmith MCs that produce steel swords by casting them in molds, or detective manga in which a standard police inquiry would blow the whole intrigue out the window in under 5 min. I've given up on expecting any sense.Man, this author has no fucking clue about noble titles. Do some basic god-damn research. A Margrave is a German title equivalent to a Marquess (English) and Marquis (French) that is above an Earl/Count but below a Duke and that usually governs a border or frontier area (called a March). Just use one or the other. A Viscount is a rank below an Earl/Count and above a Baron, and usually is almost never independent.
This is very basic stuff and is just so frustrating to see wrong.
I wonder if he'd make use of some mountain path..."Not being adjacent to other countries is also a good point."
I was more under the impression that whatever territory it was before, it'll just become a dukedom anyway. Might be a viscountcy because it's just so poor and serves more as a buffer zone than as a proper defensive line. Though most likely the author is just tossing terms to the wind.Man, this author has no fucking clue about noble titles.
Well, yes and no. A duke is a feudal lord that rules a duchy, a prince is a member of the monarchy, a higher ranked position but not necessarily attached to any territory (a principality is an independent country, ruled by someone who titles themselves "prince", so it won't work in this context). Were a prince to be granted land, he may also be given a title that goes along with it, probably a high ranked one like duke.Duke is a normal title for a prince as far as I'm concerned.
The problem is that the author seems convicend that a viscount is the "more powerful" noble here (due to the line "the power of the viscountency is appealing"), while the other territories were originally marches, so if anything - they are the ones with more power invested in them.I was more under the impression that whatever territory it was before, it'll just become a dukedom anyway. Might be a viscountcy because it's just so poor and serves more as a buffer zone than as a proper defensive line. Though most likely the author is just tossing terms to the wind.
None of this is relevant. It's not Earth. It's extremely common and very reasonable for fiction to use the titles from multiple sources in different ways. Heck, your knowledge of the titles isn't actually universally correct either. These things varied within the same territories at different times in human history, so what knowledge you have is just true for a given range of years.Man, this author has no fucking clue about noble titles. Do some basic god-damn research. A Margrave is a German title equivalent to a Marquess (English) and Marquis (French) that is above an Earl/Count but below a Duke and that usually governs a border or frontier area (called a March). Just use one or the other. A Viscount is a rank below an Earl/Count and above a Baron, and usually is almost never independent.
This is very basic stuff and is just so frustrating to see wrong.
Herbs are expensive? From how far are they imported? Or pure dungeon drops from a difficult dungeon?
There is a reason to worry about the smell. It permeates a person, so the person themselves smell of a digested garlic (which is different from fresh garlic, by the way). It is very unpleasant and in formal situations, if someone smelled of garlic, most people would consider that very bad manners.Garlic tastes too good to worry about any smell.
It's normal for a price of the same country. It's not normal for a prince of a foreign country. Especially a prince with very bad reputation.Duke is a normal title for a prince as far as I'm concerned.
Considering Hati was given by the Sacred Beast for him to raise, I don't think the elves have any claim. Unless I'm mixing up mangas.
And Diana can decide for herself.
There is no indication this world uses a different hierarchy for such titles than the traditional European one, if you think otherwise, point to chapter and page that sys as much.None of this is relevant. It's not Earth. It's extremely common and very reasonable for fiction to use the titles from multiple sources in different ways. Heck, your knowledge of the titles isn't actually universally correct either. These things varied within the same territories at different times in human history, so what knowledge you have is just true for a given range of years.
Just a small correction, trash authors and illustrators skimp on the research. The good ones are just better monetized, so rarely will appear on sites like MD.You're howling at the moon. Authors don't do any research even about the sole topic their work revolves around anymore. There are manga about blacksmith MCs that produce steel swords by casting them in molds, or detective manga in which a standard police inquiry would blow the whole intrigue out the window in under 5 min. I've given up on expecting any sense.
I wouldn't say they are trash authors. The overall stories are interesting (at least by the opinion of me and other people who rate them. Who would read them otherwise?), the art is great but the nonsense keeps piling up whenever there's a topic requiring some less then common knowledge. I've seen this in all sorts of works, not just manga so I'm confident in saying that authors just don't care to put in any research. Probably because hardly anyone complains or even realizes there's an issue. It's a universal problem.Just a small correction, trash authors and illustrators skimp on the research. The good ones are just better monetized, so rarely will appear on sites like MD.
Mold casting blade blanks is fine, they just need to be worked afterwords. And yes they would be shit at their intended use, but didn't stop they manufacture.
Honestly one of the more egregious illustration errors has to be fired bullets. While mangaka don't by any means have a monopoly cocking up the difference between an unsent round and a bullet in flight, they do seem to have many repeat offenders despite how vocal their community is.
That's not a "yes and no." That's just a "yes." It's normal for a prince to have the title of Duke. And I said it's normal for me. Look at the royal children of Sweden and what titles they have.Well, yes and no. A duke is a feudal lord that rules a duchy, a prince is a member of the monarchy, a higher ranked position but not necessarily attached to any territory (a principality is an independent country, ruled by someone who titles themselves "prince", so it won't work in this context). Were a prince to be granted land, he may also be given a title that goes along with it, probably a high ranked one like duke.
The main problem with that is that it doesn't even matter. He's becoming a duke either way, so it doesn't matter what the area was previously.The problem is that the author seems convicend that a viscount is the "more powerful" noble here (due to the line "the power of the viscountency is appealing"), while the other territories were originally marches, so if anything - they are the ones with more power invested in them.
Herbs aren't used in large quantities, like grain and vegetables, so they don't take much effort or space to cultivate. Being difficult to cultivate would be offset by what I said previously as well.Distance is just one factor in price of spices. Some may be difficult to cultivate. Some may be difficult to store for long. Some may be difficult to process. Some may have simply low supply, maybe because they're new or maybe because there are more important things to grow on available land.
But they've also been available for most people. Not in large quantities, but you don't need a lot of spices unless you're one of a few cultures of Asian.Spices are largely luxury goods. That always increased their price in history, at least until the time that there started to be too much of everything.
Exactly. A way to tie him into the country. He may have a bad reputation, but they're aware of how valuable he is, so he's treated as a native royal.It's normal for a price of the same country. It's not normal for a prince of a foreign country. Especially a prince with very bad reputation.
Of course, it would still become normal for a foreign prince, even with bad reputation, once he'd marry a princess of the country...so yeah.
See pretty much any war.You're not mixing them up and you are right that they have no claim. People do feel entitled to things they have no right to on a regular basis.
Yeah, meeting is perfectly fine. Meeting means talking, and communication is good. Unless it's just used for demands, but that's a different issue.That's why they want to meet. They don't know whether Diana wants to be with him or not right now.
This is one difference between steel and bronze (and other copper alloys, including pure copper). Bronze you can cast, and it'll still perform better than an iron sword. Even better if you work-harden the edges, though.Unless you mean manufacturing wall-hangers that are not meant to be used for anything, then no, it's not fine.
No, it's not quite normal. It's true that when it happened, a high ranking title like "duke" was commonly given, but the concept of all members of a royal family having a "royal dukedom" is a modern invention, from the XXth century onwards. Historically this was the exception, rather than the norm and was only afforded to an heir to the throne (remember, the monarch usually had many children) or to fulfill some specific political goals. Land was precious and used to garner support among the gentry, your son was already on your side (and if he wasn't then he was aimning to usurp you, so you won't change his mind), so giving it to him is a waste, not to mention it affords him a lot of independent power - he can use the income to raise his own army.That's not a "yes and no." That's just a "yes." It's normal for a prince to have the title of Duke. And I said it's normal for me. Look at the royal children of Sweden and what titles they have.
Consequences (or lack thereof) for the MC are not what we're talking about. The point made was that the author has no idea what what he's talking about, which is all the more shameful, since looking up noble titles hierarchy only takes a moment and his story revolves around noble society.The main problem with that is that it doesn't even matter. He's becoming a duke either way, so it doesn't matter what the area was previously.
Not in the middle ages they weren't. Any amount of spices would look like a fortune to a peasant and he'd likely get himself in trouble for theft for even having it. You couldn't even purchase them at a typical commoner's marketplace, the merchants would laugh you out of there for even asking. Spices became more available (though still terribly expensive) to the public with the advent of the renaissance.But they've also been available for most people. Not in large quantities, but you don't need a lot of spices unless you're one of a few cultures of Asian.
Depends on what you mean by "perform". Bronze is soft so it tends to bend, rather than break, the ease of repairing it is certainly a big plus. However, it has major disadvantages even when compared to crude historical steel. It's softness makes it less effective against gambesons and other light armor and you can't make practical longer blades out of it, so you're at a reach disadvantage.This is one difference between steel and bronze (and other copper alloys, including pure copper). Bronze you can cast, and it'll still perform better than an iron sword. Even better if you work-harden the edges, though.
You can make them suck less by casting multiple times, while carefully controlling how the crystalline structure and it's grain formes. They will still be inferior to properly forged ones and the process is lengthy and costly, therefore being impractical.But it's in theory possible to cast steel swords. With modern technology it's more feasible (pre-industrial absolutely not), and may be done with magic (since we don't know exactly how that magic works).
While I would never say they were all trash, but the majority are trash... you can tell by the numerous dumpsterfires left in their wake. Their entire skill set is based on tired tropes and hackneyed clichés.I wouldn't say they are trash authors. The overall stories are interesting (at least by the opinion of me and other people who rate them. Who would read them otherwise?), the art is great but the nonsense keeps piling up whenever there's a topic requiring some less then common knowledge. I've seen this in all sorts of works, not just manga so I'm confident in saying that authors just don't care to put in any research. Probably because hardly anyone complains or even realizes there's an issue. It's a universal problem.
You do know there were iron swords before they made steel, right? I never said they were good swords, infact I said they were rather shit at their intended use. That however doesn't have any revelance to the fact real world that swords were produced through casting them from molten metal.Unless you mean manufacturing wall-hangers that are not meant to be used for anything, then no, it's not fine. Shit is an understatement, you can't hope to work out the internal stresses that would have formed in a full-length cast like that, nor would it benefit from the removal of any impurities that usually results from forging. Unless by "blank" you mean just a lump of steel that is yet to be hammered down to the desired length and structure, then it makes more sense. Still, steel requires a ridiculosly high temperature to melt down and even if you can achieve it (which should be out of reach for the blacksmiths portrayed, they have simple coal furnaces), melting it properly is still infeasible with medieval technology - it would just burn if simply heated to melting point in the open air.
While I'm sure some instances were intentionally produced as satire, your statement sounds more like agreement with the sentiments of my post rather then arguments against.You mean a bullet flying through the air while still in it's casing? That's a classic Hollywood trope, which only illustrates that not only the poorly-paid authors can't be arsed to read up on any topic.
NGL, while I'm sure the execution was different, that looks rather similar to to dinner last night xD
NGL, I'm starting to wonder if you're not intentionally being obtuse and a bit of a troll. No one is saying that cast bronze or iron made weapons were better then steel, only that they were made and existed.Depends on what you mean by "perform". Bronze is soft so it tends to bend, rather than break, the ease of repairing it is certainly a big plus. However, it has major disadvantages even when compared to crude historical steel. It's softness makes it less effective against gambesons and other light armor and you can't make practical longer blades out of it, so you're at a reach disadvantage.
Hence why the practices were retired and new processes were developed and used.You can make them suck less by casting multiple times, while carefully controlling how the crystalline structure and it's grain formes. They will still be inferior to properly forged ones and the process is lengthy and costly, therefore being impractical.
All right, but how many examples to the contrary can you think of?While I would never say they were all trash, but the majority are trash... you can tell by the numerous dumpsterfires left in their wake. Their entire skill set is based on tired tropes and hackneyed clichés.
I do, but you responded to my comment about steel swords, why bring up iron now? Also, iron swords were not cast. The problems I mentioned with steel apply to any ferrous metal when casting.You do know there were iron swords before they made steel, right? I never said they were good swords, infact I said they were rather shit at their intended use. That however doesn't have any revelance to the fact real world that swords were produced through casting them from molten metal.
I meant it as a counter point to what you said about well-monetized works being more sensible.While I'm sure some instances were intentionally produced as satire, your statement sounds more like agreement with the sentiments of my post rather then arguments against.