Tenshi wo Ikasete Item Get!! Ikigacha de Dungeon Kouryaku! - Ch. 6.2

[Plippity]

On one hand the grandma sex advice is like, beyond what I would expect from this manga, but on the other hand it's a little crazy that the answer to the problem of your partner not climaxing is going out and sleeping with other people instead of, idk, communicating with your partner and figuring out what works best for them together. Feel like if you're having this much sex you gotta be figuring some stuff out ngl.

But I guess we gotta find a way to have the MC go bang other chicks.

 

[thebluchicken_4]

Prostitution arc

 

[Ultenth]

On one hand the grandma sex advice is like, beyond what I would expect from this manga, but on the other hand it's a little crazy that the answer to the problem of your partner not climaxing is going out and sleeping with other people instead of, idk, communicating with your partner and figuring out what works best for them together. Feel like if you're having this much sex you gotta be figuring some stuff out ngl.

But I guess we gotta find a way to have the MC go bang other chicks.

Yeah, all this whole thing is just people in Japan who believe this telling on themselves. You couldn't get this information out of me with torture. I'm so bad in bad, and understand what pleases my partner, that I need to go pay someone to teach me how to do sex good so I can pretend to my partner that I'm good without actually having to communicate and learn with them.

 

[ry3te4]

Let's go swim in the raw sewage yay!

 

[Seraphus]

Thanks for the upload, @Slavgaard !
Bummer about the slow release schedule.

This is a brilliant manga, and I love everything about it; Seraphus Sera is the best girl, and Yoshie is greatly wise.

I do wonder if Sera is going to gacha the shit out of Yoshie and make her young again, but... 😅

Lots, and I mean A LOT, of comments here from people who haven't lived enough or loved enough to see the reality and wisdom of what Obaa-san is telling our MC (And that's not an insult or a dig, but an observation; the same was true of me at 19 years old).
Her advice isn't for him to remain skin-deep, and just be a ho (which seems a majority of criticism, here); she's suggesting that he (the MC), as a person who is grossly inexperienced with sexual congress, go and become experienced in both making love, and giving love.

You can't really know the nuance and intricacies of this without experience; that's just a fact, and it's even further evidenced by some of the judgey, ignorant, and honestly kinda provincial comments people have laid down, here.

I'm sure the butt-hurt masses will prove me right with a bunch of ❌, but... I hope I'm wrong.
(Cos, yanno, that's, just, like, your opinion, maaaan...)

 

[gr2222]

I didnt expect granny to say COCK on the first page...


Technically speaking on a biological level males are made to go around and impregnate everyone they can.
That goes for other animals too, the only reason we don't is because we decided that we won't.
But idk if that's what she means.

where did you even get that from? most animals do not have a single partner, but that doesn't matter because almost all social animals do.

humans evolved in a way to mostly be monogamous, males and females included. your first statement is only true for less than 1% of the male population. it's not because men want to 'impregnate woman', we know for a fact that our male predecessors (about 1.9 million years ego) where protectors of the family and valued their mate and children, and were starting to become monogamous (after we ware apes at least)

besides the author of this clearly does not understand that even men feel better when they do it with someone the actually love.

 

[Derksy]

where did you even get that from? most animals do not have a single partner, but that doesn't matter because almost all social animals do.

humans evolved in a way to mostly be monogamous, males and females included. your first statement is only true for less than 1% of the male population. it's not because men want to 'impregnate woman', we know for a fact that our male predecessors (about 1.9 million years ego) where protectors of the family and valued their mate and children, and were starting to become monogamous (after we ware apes at least)

besides the author of this clearly does not understand that even men feel better when they do it with someone the actually love.

Being monogamous is not an evolution trait, it's a concept created from social norms.

You say that "all social animals are monogamous" which is not true btw.
For example, Bonobos have a wide range of sexual interactions.
Not just for mating, they fuck to have fun, to make up after fights or even to teach the young ones how to do it.

There's a reason why one male (of almost all species) can impregnate multiple women easily.
It's because from an evolution standpoint if shit hits the fan, if at least one guy is left then we can manage a future.

We don't send woman to war not only because we wand to be nice to them, it's because we don't need as many men as we do women to repopulate if necessary.
That's why, yes, we are made that way.

But like I said, in periods of peace and tranquility we just don't do it, that's it.

 

[gr2222]

Being monogamous is not an evolution trait, it's a concept created from social norms.

You say that "all social animals are monogamous" which is not true btw.
For example, Bonobos have a wide range of sexual interactions.
Not just for mating, they fuck to have fun, to make up after fights or even to teach the young ones how to do it.

There's a reason why one male (of almost all species) can impregnate multiple women easily.
It's because from an evolution standpoint if shit hits the fan, if at least one guy is left then we can manage a future.

We don't send woman to war not only because we wand to be nice to them, it's because we don't need as many men as we do women to repopulate if necessary.
That's why, yes, we are made that way.

But like I said, in periods of peace and tranquility we just don't do it, that's it.

i said MOST, not ALL. besides more then 90% of all birds are monogamous. And birds are know to be very social.

and as i already said, human predecessors (way over a million years ego) were also mostly monogamous, when there wasn't society or even language, which completely makes your point invalid.