Very interesting read.
You can apply this same argument for most species on earth, actually only very few are of human “use” and we have time and time again let die all those non charismatic species that can’t adapt to the world we ourselves have changed.
Even in that alternate universe I doubt every one in every country would think that dragons are useless and unnecessary more than say, tigers or polar bears. They would just be endangered or extinct in the wild, maybe their genomes would get sampled because the evolution of the third pair of limbs for one reason or another.
No one is trying to make use of giant salamanders or river ray, no one pretends whiptails or caecilians are good or charismatic pets, yet people do study them. We have studied fossil for hundreds of years and there’s literally no reason why to, dinosaurs or giant marine reptiles or eocene megafauna are all dead for good and tells us nothing about how to make more money, yet still we care about them, I care about them, those baffling ediacaran and cambrian fauna that has no living descendants, which we can’t even tell if they were actually animals or plants or vertebrates or whatnot, all those halucigenias, opabinias and tully monsters.
I think dragons would be safe, if they were real, because we can care about things that we shouldn’t have to. If they can make us wonder and ask ourselves questions, inspire us or amuse us, they are good enough to keep around, even in a world that we ourselves made inhospitable for them. All in all, we owe them that much, just like we owe all those insect and amphibians that go extinct every year in our world. We owe them a place that we took from them, with our microplastics and our climate change, but in the end, no species lasts for ever and neither will we. We keep zoos and museums exactly because they can inspire us, and to remind us what we’ve lost, and what we will lose...