The Heavenly Path Is Not Stupid - Ch. 67

[MangaDex]

 

[Seraphsent]

Wow it turns out that arc was completely pointless and we didn't even see tits. Awesome.
My frustration with this writing, despite being leftist af myself, is that it's a child's understanding of communism. You have a very different entity joining your commune, try to talk about how to fix the friction between this entity and the rest of the commune. How do you smooth over differences and prejudices? What do you do if their enemies attack them, do you have a moral requirement to collectively defend them?
Like give me something here, you cannot add politics to your manhua in such a shallow way. I'd have issues with something as anodyne as democracy being discussed like this.

 

[Yankun]

Wow it turns out that arc was completely pointless and we didn't even see tits. Awesome.
My frustration with this writing, despite being leftist af myself, is that it's a child's understanding of communism. You have a very different entity joining your commune, try to talk about how to fix the friction between this entity and the rest of the commune. How do you smooth over differences and prejudices? What do you do if their enemies attack them, do you have a moral requirement to collectively defend them?
Like give me something here, you cannot add politics to your manhua in such a shallow way. I'd have issues with something as anodyne as democracy being discussed like this.

I, for some reason, am not seeing the problem you seem to be seeing here.
This is very much just the usual "be tolerating to those different than you" type of shit. How is it having anything to do with insertion of communism here? Just because of the word "commune"?

In the first place, this isn't quite communism they are building in my eyes.
I'm no expert, but they seem to be stating clearly that people are rewarded based on their performance. Once you meet the minimum, the more you do, the better your reward is going to be. So yes, while they seem to be working for a collective, they do own their fruit of labor to freely choose what to do with it. It's not exactly "communism" where they work how much they can, and get what they need provided to them. It just means they need efforts to better their lives.

Yes, that sounds communism enough, but not at the level to be crashing out.
It sounds more like an attempt to join forces and overcome the hardship in front of you.

In the first place, they already said that both side are to be working out a way to co-exist together (fulfilling the minimum requirements to be there and tolerate them being there). They are going to be smoothing the differences over to the best they can (not cutting even, mind you). Why are you crashing out about that?

And what's that about collective defense? Are you talking about NATO here? These people are saying they are going to exist together, not banding together so they have more friends in emergencies. Did you see any agreement on that to even question the topic?

Look, this manhua is just saying that shit where "If you want to go fast, you walk alone. But if you want to go further, you walk together." They are even talking about just fulfilling the minimum there. The feel good message is that it takes effort to get better lives, and pooling efforts together is easier. It's even criticizing communism, as I see it.

Besides, you chose to keep reading. So instead of complaints, you can just forget about this poor insertion of communism, you know? Why even crashing out about it here?