The Jester of Phantom Tears - Oneshot

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
897
I don't really understand but i think this mean there no real answer even you do good people can still thinking you're bad
 
Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2025
Messages
2
I don't think this line was properly translated, it doesn't make any sense.
Wouldn't that reflect the king's poor management of the kingdom's resources? After all, he doesn’t even seem fit to be king.


However, given the circumstances, the kingdom probably needed additional resources to import food or handle the ongoing crisis. In that case, raising taxes could be seen as a necessary evil in the short term. I mean, Monarchs often raised taxes during crises (wars, famines, or to pay debts), and it was seen as a necessary but unpopular decision.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
151
Wouldn't that reflect the king's poor management of the kingdom's resources? After all, he doesn’t even seem fit to be king.


However, given the circumstances, the kingdom probably needed additional resources to import food or handle the ongoing crisis. In that case, raising taxes could be seen as a necessary evil in the short term. I mean, Monarchs often raised taxes during crises (wars, famines, or to pay debts), and it was seen as a necessary but unpopular decision.
Arrogance is what brought him down instead of humbling himself as the jester said to the boy who is now king to keep questioning their actions are wise or not
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
428
medium.jpg
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
1,464
The original line is "We can't afford to lower the tax. Do the people want us to starve to death?" This on top of the previous narration "Many people died from hunger" is supposed to show how foolish the king was.
Yeah, I had a feeling that's what the translation was supposed to be. Thanks for the correction!
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Dec 3, 2023
Messages
1,581
I thought this was pretty good, and I assume that the implication at the end was supposed to be that the Jester cries for all of the kings he's served under, and it's just that no one gets to see that because he always ends up alone in the end?
 
Joined
May 3, 2020
Messages
41
I thought this was pretty good, and I assume that the implication at the end was supposed to be that the Jester cries for all of the kings he's served under, and it's just that no one gets to see that because he always ends up alone in the end?
I took it more as “the jester will cry for a king worth crying for” but there has never been one, because all of them are like this king where at the start he wanted to do good but ended up getting blinded by power.

But that’s just my guess.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top