Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2020
- Messages
- 2,013
Yes, but we can't know which one it is, nothing in the story can be used as proof that it has gone either way.Yes, that doesn't mean they all had the change in mind. A lot of plans change halfway through.
That's only objectionable if the person is a illiterate moron who judges a book by its cover or name, nothing objectionable happened in the story.Implying that "My wife reincarnated, so I'm going to marry her" is less objectionable than "My wife possessed a random child... so I'm going to marry her".
No, the identities never merged, she snapped at him because she believe she was her actual mother, your argument falls apart because literally the entire story until she revealed the truth to the mother she had to lie and play the child act exactly because she had none of the memories, if they merged she would have both memories, she literally had to learn everything she could about the child life to try fool eveyone because the whole time they're separate entities.I very specifically remember the part where he was talking to her about the abusive, negligent mother, and she snapped at him for talking shit about her. The identities were clearly merged. The idea that they're completely separate entities sharing a single body is only introduced in the second half. Before, we accept that she has memories of her past life, but is also in the body of a child, with its own impulses. Even if I downloaded all my memories to 5-year-old me, he'd probably still love his mom.
And again, who says it's a second half? Your entire argument is based on the premise that the author retconned the story, to which you have zero proof, nothing anywhere implies the author changed how the story would go.