//snip// I’m tired of the victim blaming. //snip//
⬆️ this, in regards to that
⬇️
I wonder if people do not realise or can not accept to realise there is no one here without fault, Manaka might be the only exception since she really did not do anything wrong,she just fell in love with the wrong guy.
Meanwhile Ueno is reaping what he sew because who the fk uses his friends clothing to masturbate.
Think Logically,Ueno couldve had his life ended right there by Chisaki do you know whats the crimiminal thats most hated in Japan?
Sex offenders,thats what Ueno was morally speaking, his entire life couldve been ruined from simply being called to the school board.
I enjoy this story because its so morally gray that it keeps me captivated.
Secretly masturbating while holding someone's clothes doesn't justify any amount of torture, and nothing ever justifies any amount of sexual assault. A victim's 'imperfections' do nothing to ease the wrong of sexual crimes committed against them.
I probably shouldn't be the one to talk about this because none of the sex stuff in this series does anything for me, but like, yes, the "logic" is that the masturbation incident gave the girls an excuse to abuse him. That has less to do with the "real world logic" of him being ruined by a criminal record (zero percent chance of that as he was a minor in middle school whose name would have been redacted, though maybe he'd have to change schools) and more to do with the dubious "logic" of porn: This series is for people who want to be dominated by a cruel woman and have a lot of guilt and shame tied up in their views on sex generally and kink specifically.
There are a lot of story elements at play that exist only to facilitate the audience's hog-cranking, and the guilt that tethers him to the girls is one of them: He's been a naughty boy who needs to be punished. The in-story victim blaming is part of what makes the erotica go.
The story regards very little of this through an
actual moral lens when it's in the moment, because it's not looking at things like "harm" or "consent." Instead its sexual morality operates on the axis of shame - "that which is shameful is wrong (and therefore hot.)"
ex.: "He has a sexual fetish that she conditioned into him; this fetish forces him to seek her out for sexual release just as much as her fetish forces her to non-consensually bully him because they've both 'fallen to pleasure.' Because they both have fetishes and are thus 'perverts,' both are equally at fault." Naturally, most people don't really believe that here: Having a fetish isn't a moral concern as long as you act on it in responsible ways with consenting adults, and having a fetish does not FORCE you to do crimes.
The idea that "raping someone until they 'can't live without it' is morally gray (even romantic) as long as you 'take responsibility' for them" does not belong in the real world. But it is everywhere in Japanese porn and it's not incompatible with Japan's BDSM culture's values, historically.
The series makes gestures at developing moral values in line with the real world, at Ueno maybe growing as a person, accepting his kinks and dealing with them in a healthy way or learning to live without them, and breaking away from his tormentors... but it's still very much trying to have things both ways, as both a drama about victims moving on and as erotica for people who fantasize about being in Ueno's sexual situations. I'm very curious to see how it reconciles them in the future, because it seems to want to.
Ultimately it's fiction, so it doesn't even have to TRY and get it right. Most readers seem to be able to keep the two value systems separate. But understand that there are two systems in place that are moving the story and motivating the characters, and they're in tension with one another.