I've said this in another work...But author's can't just go around calling a thing a "magic something" (and in both instances, it happens to be a "magic bus") if there's not also a non-magical variant of that thing in operation as well.
I've said this in another work...But author's can't just go around calling a thing a "magic something" (and in both instances, it happens to be a "magic bus") if there's not also a non-magical variant of that thing in operation as well.
The issue isn't what it is or isn't. Author could call it a "magic train" and the point would still stand -- unless there's a non-magical counterpart also operating, adding the "magic" modifier is foolish.
Just wanted to say thanks for the tl. Whether it's by magic bus or train, it's a great trip... yeah i had to stop myself from saying it's a hell of a ride.