We don't care about "staff picks", we need chapter views

[FLUB]

Seriously, stop adding useless things that no one will look at. Give us what we really want

 

[BraveDude8]

Chapter views rely on site functionality that doesn't exist yet and there's absolutely nothing the frontend developers can do to solve that. Staff picks are a modified implementation of the same functionality used for the Seasonal list/your own personal manga lists, and didn't require any backend/infra work.

 

[enustaHukiM]

I care about staff picks
better blunt rotation than the recent popular set

 

[waterflame]

Here you go fam. I got you. Sometimes it won't work because well the "server" gets overloaded. Just click or soemthing. If you don't already have tampermonkey. You can get it for your browser at http://tampermonkey.net

// ==UserScript==
// @name         Return of the viewcounts to mangadex
// @version      1
// @description  Return of the viewcounts to mangadex
// @author       waterflame
// @match        https://mangadex.org/*
// @grant        none
// ==/UserScript==

(function() {
    'use strict';

    function waitForElm(selector) {
        return new Promise(resolve => {
            if (document.querySelector(selector)) {
                return resolve(document.querySelector(selector));
            }

            const observer = new MutationObserver(mutations => {
                if (document.querySelector(selector)) {
                    observer.disconnect();
                    resolve(document.querySelector(selector));
                }
            });

            observer.observe(document.body, {
                childList: true,
                subtree: true
            });
        });
    }

    waitForElm('.view-count').then((elm) => {
        document.querySelectorAll('.view-count').forEach(function(elm) {
            elm.querySelector("span").textContent = Math.floor((Math.random() * 99999)/2);
        })
    });

    document.addEventListener("click", function(evnt){
        waitForElm('.view-count').then((elm) => {
            document.querySelectorAll('.view-count').forEach(function(elm) {
                elm.querySelector("span").textContent = Math.floor((Math.random() * 99999)/2);
            })
        });
    });

})();

 

[KATCRX]

Why would it take so long to develop it, I thought you could use Ai to write code and stuff nowadays?

 

[Heika]

Why would it take so long to develop it, I thought you could use Ai to write code and stuff nowadays?

Right now writing code with AI is more like walking another, worse coder through doing it.

 

[TestAddress]

Seriously, stop adding useless things that no one will look at. Give us what we really want

The problem is, you cannot cater to 300 people at once. At least pick the top 10 most active users and ask for their feedback.

 

[WindOcean]

Why would it take so long to develop it, I thought you could use Ai to write code and stuff nowadays?

Several problems:

• maintainability
• code safety
• copy right
• future plans

 

[ieatass69]

Why would it take so long to develop it, I thought you could use Ai to write code and stuff nowadays?

you will know why if you ever had to help someone debug shit written by AI. calling it debugging is really generous
short 5-8 line script that deletes your system32? sure. anything longer than 10 lines and go into production? fuck that

 

[Tristan__]

The problem is, you cannot cater to 300 people at once. At least pick the top 10 most active users and ask for their feedback.

they're already doing that?
if you didn't know then you're just not active enough
I'm pretty sure everyone there that gives feedback (me included) knew that this didn't take a lot of effort to add