No , it's same as the LN
No its the same as the wn too.I meant WN. But OK, so the author changed it. I guess it's more interesting this way.
It sucks being out of the loopThey're joking due to some previous manga series having similar abrupt endings due to cancelation.
So I went to look up that chapter again, and you're right. Though in the WN it's really truncated compared to the manga, so I guess I forgot. There was no special version of her burst dagger, and the attack on her by the giant was much more casual. A lot of details about this battle were quite different really.No its the same as the wn too.
Backblast is not wasted energy, backblast is an unfortunate consequence of the third law. It would be impossible to push the icicle as high up without having an equal amount of energy directed in the opposite direction.so there is no waste energy aka back blast.
Since when does BIG=SOW?That giant has got to have a stealth skill or something. He keeps catching people off guard while being big and slow.
If we want to be strict about it, using 'backblast' to refer to the omni-directional explosive heat and kinetic energy of the device itself is technicallyan incorrect use of the term.Backblast is not wasted energy, backblast is an unfortunate consequence of the third law. It would be impossible to push the icicle as high up without having an equal amount of energy directed in the opposite direction.
If you draw a plane through the point of reaction (in this case, the epicenter of the explosion), splitting the resulting force vectors into those on one side of the plane (a1...an) and those on the other side of the plane (b1...bm), the sum of vectors a1...an will be the opposite of the sum of vectors b1...bm. Orit's possible because Newton's third law as far as the clause "opposite direction" is concerned only applies in a perfectly elastic and two dimensional physics model.
This is false, isn't it. If by "stuff" you actually mean mass, then less mass may be accelerated to higher velocities or more mass may be accelerated to less.shaped charges throw as much stuff and with as much force in the direction opposite to that of the jet stream
I misspoke when I said "as much stuff", but that's what I meant, yes.This is false, isn't it. If by "stuff" you actually mean mass, then less mass may be accelerated to higher velocities or more mass may be accelerated to less.
"Sound energy" is underselling how destructive a shockwave can be, especially from an explosive that evaporated most of the ice mass. In fact, we can estimate the heat energy that went into evaporating the icicle alone, even disregarding the kinetic energy that went into breaking and propelling the icicle upwards, it is gonna be a whole lot of Joules. From that, we can look up how much TNT would it take to create an equivalent explosion, and use Kingery-Bulmash to estimate the shockwave.But I disagree that the sound and heat energy distributed across the city below is as devastating as the ice mass that could have impacted it.