Yotaka Futatabi - Ch. 2 - Ass
- Thread starter MangaDex
- Start date
Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2018
- Messages
- 417
Sure but it isn't like Kant has any special moral authority. His philosophy appeals to some people but for the rest of us Kant saying something isn't particularly relevant.
It’s so wild that she’s actually 6 years older than Sakamoto!
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2025
- Messages
- 6
Not enough foids to have children with
I dunno what’s best, between the calm cruelty of him commenting on how hot younger Yotaka was, her perving on high school girls’ asses or her ending up fatter after her work out than before…
PS: I dunno if you’re actually banned or not and if you’ll ever read this, but when in doubt… Your whole argumentary massively sucks dick because it doesn’t take into account the fact that like 90% of our environmental problems basically boil down to overpopulation. Not having too many kids is the right thing to do right now if you actually want to benefit society at large: it’s called demographic transition and every “civilized, desirable” nation goes trough it.
insert “Aliens” meme here
Begone, demon! Why in the world would you ruin a perfectly fine 30-something woman with kids?!?
PS: I dunno if you’re actually banned or not and if you’ll ever read this, but when in doubt… Your whole argumentary massively sucks dick because it doesn’t take into account the fact that like 90% of our environmental problems basically boil down to overpopulation. Not having too many kids is the right thing to do right now if you actually want to benefit society at large: it’s called demographic transition and every “civilized, desirable” nation goes trough it.
Strange take coming from someone with a Megumin profile pic, but okay, I guess?
Genetics…18 extra kilograms and they all went to the right places. Praise be!
insert “Aliens” meme here
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2023
- Messages
- 1,905
Fake news. Every country on the planet has below replacement fertility apart from the sh*thole countries.PS: I dunno if you’re actually banned or not and if you’ll ever read this, but when in doubt… Your whole argumentary massively sucks dick because it doesn’t take into account the fact that like 90% of our environmental problems basically boil down to overpopulation. Not having too many kids is the right thing to do right now if you actually want to benefit society at large: it’s called demographic transition and every “civilized, desirable” nation goes trough it.
Environmental pollution is mainly caused by a certain stage of industrialisation and development, not by population size. Nearly all the pollution in the world is caused by a few developping countries like the Philippines and China, not countries like Japan. So the idea that Japan's population collapsing will help solve environmental pollution is totally wrong.
In fact, the opposite is true because Japan is one of the few countries in the world where nearly all the technological patents and original research comes from, so Japan is one of the countries that would be the most useful in inventing technology that can help fix the environmental problems caused by more primitive industrial technology. So Japan's population collapsing will make pollution worse because we will be deprived of the advanced technological solutions to pollution that they would have invented.
When you say that civilised, desirable nations go through demographic transition, what you mean is that average family size goes from 5+ because of high child mortality down to 2.1 which is replacement fertility rate and allows society to have a constant supply of young labour and maintain the services and infrastructure and not have demographic collapse.
But this is not what is happening in Japan, they;re on;y having 1.1 children per woman which means taht within 2 generations the number of babies being born decreases 75% which is obviously not good for soceity because you can't maintain services and infrastructure and thus quality of life when you have an inverted population pyramid with far more old people needing looked after than young people working . If your country goes from 2 people working for every old person needing supported to 1 person working for every 2 old people needing supported then the societal services and quality of life are obviously going to go down. Your mistake is thinking that going from population expansion to maintaining a steady population with a replacement fertility rate that maintain the supply of labour is the same as going from population expansion to your population collapsing due to a fertility rate that's far below replacement rate with an exponentially falling supply of labour and ageing population.
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Messages
- 49
give her more thiccness
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Messages
- 49
You're banned on a site like this, an even more pathetic site.
Want kids so bad, then create a football team yourself, loser. Don't force your slave-brain thought process on others.
Edit: Oh, guess you're not banned. Well then, go create that football team. Capitalists need more people for the wage slave grinder.
Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2019
- Messages
- 746
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Messages
- 4
She's in shape!
Bla bla bla can’t hear you over how dumb you sound when you don’t seem to realize that since the West has transferred most of its industry to China and neighboring countries, the pollution accounted as Chinese is – for a good part – the pollution of producing our shit, hence our pollution.
If the whole world were to live with the level of energy and materials consumption of Americans or Japanese (those mofos sure like their plastic wrappings, damn…), it would simply collapse. Good thing those shithole countries can’t get any decent electricity production, we’d be cooked if that billion of Africans used as much power as we do!
Hence we’ve got two options. Either let the capitalist grinder slowly but surely bring us all to the living standards of Botswana while a select few live in complete luxury, or bring the world population down so that a Western lifestyle is sustainable for all of us out there.
Also, stop sucking Japan’s dick. Those mofos can’t even feed themselves with how numerous they are on that tiny island full of mountains: it’s gonna be fun watching them eat all those patents when the price of fertilizer will have grown fivefold!
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2023
- Messages
- 1,905
This is all fake news. The reason that China, phillipines, indonesia, India, nigeria and so on produce so much pollution isn't because of western countries. If they wanted to they could adopt the same rules concerning pollution as in western countries or Japan, and then they would no longer produce disproportionately much pollution, but those countries don't because pollution is not a priority for them compared with economic development because their people are still mostly poor.
The hypothetical "if the world were to live with the same level of consumption as the Japanese" is so vague it;s basically meaningless. It sounds like you're trying to imagine under-developed african countries using the same amount of electricity per person as Japan, which obviously they can't do right now, but if you're imagining that they somehow reached the same level of technological development as Japan then presumably the whole world would also be producing the same output of scientific research as Japan, which would mean >100x more cutting edge, efficiency boosting research which would totally change the face of energy production , environmental technologies, green technologies, etc. which would likely make the world a much better place than now rather than things being "cooked"
We'd only be cooked under this hypothetical if you assumethe world becoming as developed as Japan yet not producing as much useful scientific research as Japanese people do, but if you d that then you're also implicitlyadmitting how vital Japan is as one of the only places on earth that can produce innovative scientific and technological research that can solve the world's problems, which concedes the argument that it is important for the welfare of the world that the Japanese don't let their population collapse .
Thinking that population collapse in the only populations capable of innovative scientific and technological research would improve the average global living conditions is such an infantile understanding of the world lmao.
It's like you think that world works like a spread sheet with 100 points which represent both resources and living standards and you can just cross out half of the population of the world and edit the spreadsheet cells so that the remaining people all have double the points as they did before.
In reality, the entire world benefits when the productive, innovative countries continue to be productive and innovative because the rest of the world ends up being able to benefit from all the life-improving, efficiency boosting technologies of those few innovative countries that would have taken them 50 or 100 years or more to develop on their own.
Your idea of the world improving if Japan/USA's population were to collapse is as wrong as rural people believing that they'd be better off if the capital city in their country collapsed. In reality, the capital city is where nearly all the innovation in that country happens due to aggregation effects and that innovation produces technologies and surplus that then spread and benefit the rural population.
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you! third worlders man lmao
I’m not reading that wall of “I don’t understand anything about economics” text, thank you very much.
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2025
- Messages
- 21
There's a reason why Japan has population collapse in the first place. They're only productive because they forego their own wellbeing, and so have no time raising a family.This is all fake news. The reason that China, phillipines, indonesia, India, nigeria and so on produce so much pollution isn't because of western countries. If they wanted to they could adopt the same rules concerning pollution as in western countries or Japan, and then they would no longer produce disproportionately much pollution, but those countries don't because pollution is not a priority for them compared with economic development because their people are still mostly poor.
The hypothetical "if the world were to live with the same level of consumption as the Japanese" is so vague it;s basically meaningless. It sounds like you're trying to imagine under-developed african countries using the same amount of electricity per person as Japan, which obviously they can't do right now, but if you're imagining that they somehow reached the same level of technological development as Japan then presumably the whole world would also be producing the same output of scientific research as Japan, which would mean >100x more cutting edge, efficiency boosting research which would totally change the face of energy production , environmental technologies, green technologies, etc. which would likely make the world a much better place than now rather than things being "cooked"
We'd only be cooked under this hypothetical if you assumethe world becoming as developed as Japan yet not producing as much useful scientific research as Japanese people do, but if you d that then you're also implicitlyadmitting how vital Japan is as one of the only places on earth that can produce innovative scientific and technological research that can solve the world's problems, which concedes the argument that it is important for the welfare of the world that the Japanese don't let their population collapse .
Thinking that population collapse in the only populations capable of innovative scientific and technological research would improve the average global living conditions is such an infantile understanding of the world lmao.
It's like you think that world works like a spread sheet with 100 points which represent both resources and living standards and you can just cross out half of the population of the world and edit the spreadsheet cells so that the remaining people all have double the points as they did before.
In reality, the entire world benefits when the productive, innovative countries continue to be productive and innovative because the rest of the world ends up being able to benefit from all the life-improving, efficiency boosting technologies of those few innovative countries that would have taken them 50 or 100 years or more to develop on their own.
Your idea of the world improving if Japan/USA's population were to collapse is as wrong as rural people believing that they'd be better off if the capital city in their country collapsed. In reality, the capital city is where nearly all the innovation in that country happens due to aggregation effects and that innovation produces technologies and surplus that then spread and benefit the rural population.
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you! third worlders man lmao
Talk about missing the forest for the trees
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2023
- Messages
- 1,905
The guy arguing that population collapse is good for the economy and that scientific and technological research isn't important and beneficial for humanity's wellbeing is claiming that other people don't understand anything about economics lol that's a good one.I’m not reading that wall of “I don’t understand anything about economics” text, thank you very much.
That is not the core reason why Japan's population is falling. The likes of Sweden, Norway, Denmark, UK, Spain , Italy, Greece, France, Canada, Mexico, USA and the rest of the Americas which all have have a range of either more relaxed working lifestyles than Japan or more generous child-rearing assistance from the state or both all also have well below replacement fertility and so are also undergoing population collapse. Infact with a very few exceptions every country has falling, below-replacement fertility apart from very poor sh*thole countries. So Japan's population would still be collapsing even if they had adopted a more relaxed working lifestyle or more child-rearing benefits like in many other European countries or countries in the Americas
