Who cares about the old party members, they can get wrecked.we don't know if she has kid or not yet, but it really doesn't matter
don't forget his current harem members all have kids that as old as him
You don't. Most monarchies make a point of the ruler being a blood relative of the ruling house. This is why the last queen of England's husband, Phillip, was a prince his entire life, and not a king. Dynasties don't take themselves lightly.You do if you marry the princess next in line
William of Orange wasn't next in line after James the 2nd but he became the king of England and Scotland after James was deposed because he was married to James's daughter queen Mary. Philip the 2nd of Spain became the king of England and Ireland for 5 years after the death of Edward the 6th because he was married to Edwards oldest sister, queen Mary. Also Philip wasn't a prince he was the duke of Edinburgh.You don't. Most monarchies make a point of the ruler being a blood relative of the ruling house. This is why the last queen of England's husband, Phillip, was a prince his entire life, and not a king. Dynasties don't take themselves lightly.
William of Orange literally invaded England. As in he came there with an enormous war fleet and there was a short conflict. That he had support from most of the nobility and even the army doesn't change that, it was a coup and a change of dynasty. Which is precisely what I was saying, dynasties aren't usually in the business of supplanting themselves and no one is inviting MC to become king.William of Orange wasn't next in line after James the 2nd but he became the king of England and Scotland after James was deposed because he was married to James's daughter queen Mary. Philip the 2nd of Spain became the king of England and Ireland for 5 years after the death of Edward the 6th because he was married to Edwards oldest sister, queen Mary.
Yes, he was also an omnivore, left-handed and something of a racist. Your point? Mine is that he wasn't king.Also Philip wasn't a prince he was the duke of Edinburgh.
The fact he was invited was because he was married to the next in line are you stupid? It changes precisely nothing, also notice how you didn't say anything about Philip the 2nd of Spain, almost as if you were wrong and just ignoring the point, to expand Francis the 2nd and Henry Stuart also became kings of Scotland due to their marriage with Queen Mary. Whilst it didn't work out for them, the Drevlians tried to take over Kiev by marrying Queen Olga.William of Orange literally invaded England. As in he came there with an enormous war fleet and there was a short conflict. That he had support from most of the nobility and even the army doesn't change that, it was a coup and a change of dynasty. Which is precisely what I was saying, dynasties aren't usually in the business of supplanting themselves and no one is inviting MC to become king.
Yes, he was also an omnivore, left-handed and something of a racist. Your point? Mine is that he wasn't king.
I'm tired of you now and will no longer respond.
she was sent off to marry in a foreign kingdom, obviously it means she was either removed from the line of succession, was never part of it to begin with, or was too far down the line to matter.You do if you marry the princess next in line
Mary Queen of England was married to the king of Spain, Mary queen of Scotland was married to the king of France, there are probably other examples but I cba to look it up just to win this argument twice. The fact is she is the oldest princess so if there are no sons she would probably be next in line.she was sent off to marry in a foreign kingdom, obviously it means she was either removed from the line of succession, was never part of it to begin with, or was too far down the line to matter.
It's always the idiots with moronic takes that call others stupid, it's like a reflex for your kind. I'm no longer wasting my time on your word salad and random ass examples that show nothing else besides you not getting the point. I'll try bold text as a last resort: dynasties aren't usually in the business of supplanting themselves and no one is inviting MC to become king. Whenever they can, they'll keep it in the family. That doesn't mean they always can and sometimes they don't want to if there's family conflict. Absolutely nothing indicates that is the case here.The fact he was invited was because he was married to the next in line are you stupid? It changes precisely nothing, also notice how you didn't say anything about Philip the 2nd of Spain, almost as if you were wrong and just ignoring the point, to expand Francis the 2nd and Henry Stuart also became kings of Scotland due to their marriage with Queen Mary. Whilst it didn't work out for them, the Drevlians tried to take over Kiev by marrying Queen Olga.
"I'm tired of your random ass examples of the thing I'm asserting doesn't happen" bro the "random ass examples" literally prove you wrongIt's always the idiots with moronic takes that call others stupid, it's like a reflex for your kind. I'm no longer wasting my time on your word salad and random ass examples that show nothing else besides you not getting the point. I'll try bold text as a last resort: dynasties aren't usually in the business of supplanting themselves and no one is inviting MC to become king. Whenever they can, they'll keep it in the family. That doesn't mean they always can and sometimes they don't want to if there's family conflict. Absolutely nothing indicates that is the case here.