We Shall Now Begin Ethics. - Vol. 9 Ch. 43 - LUNCH ON THE 4TH FLOOR

[MangaDex]

 

[alful]

It's good to see this manga hasn't been forgotten

 

[_hng_]

This chapter takes the right moment to get out huh

 

[miraclebirdman]

On page 2 it says #43 in the upper left. Then, on page three, it says #48. Which is it?

 

[soidish]

If only people try to put themselves in others' shoes

 

[EchoGirl]

Why is the title in all caps? That said thanks for picking it up

 

[Paru]

Thanks for the tl, just a little rough in patches

 

[generalJET]

Thanks for the tl! I'm always glad to see translations, especially for stuff that often gets overlooked!

 

[_hng_]

Why is the title in all caps? That said thanks for picking it up

Because everyone just keeps skipping ethics class.

 

[BobSmegdorf]

"I found a new site to read manga for free on" let me hold your hand while I tell you this

 

[PhoolCat]

Because everyone just keeps skipping ethics class.

Or sleep through it.

 

[Resound]

ethics class is now in session

 

[solchimes]

Some feedback: there was some mix ups with whom sentences would be referring to. I think the student was worried about himself napping through class, and sensei is suddenly a "she" while the student is wondering what his lunch is?

Is it Saga or Sanuki?

 

[Lobo]

Thank you for picking up the translation!

 

[xyzzy]

Which one of us has not tried to be a keyboard warrior?

Or, if you were too corrupted by 4chan, a keyboard blackguard?

 

[ngkn92]

Guess that he needs a bit empathy. Too much passion without empathy sounds really annoying.

 

[MC_Engineeer]

Thank you for the chapter!!

 

[77BLc9JwJGpLVARkamJx]

Jo deez nuts.

 

[quicksilvir]

There are those people who argue in order to debate, inform, and seek the truth, and those are the ones you should spend time arguing with.

But there are many people who use debate not as a tool to exchange information, but to flood the world with their misinformation. They will change positions, use falacies, and speak without ettiquitte as long as someone is listening.

That person's goal is not to argue for a purpose, their purpose is to have an arguement. It does not matter if they win or lose, they just want to have muddied the waters and leave spectators remembering that "there is legitimacy in arguing over this topic". (See flat earthers, neo-nazis, ancient aliens, etc).

In short, arguing with them only benefits them and harms you and any spectators. Dismiss them for the jerks they are and focus your efforts on those who are genuine in their approach.

 

[Matikkkii]

There are those people who argue in order to debate, inform, and seek the truth, and those are the ones you should spend time arguing with.

But there are many people who use debate not as a tool to exchange information, but to flood the world with their misinformation. They will change positions, use falacies, and speak without ettiquitte as long as someone is listening.

That person's goal is not to argue for a purpose, their purpose is to have an arguement. It does not matter if they win or lose, they just want to have muddied the waters and leave spectators remembering that "there is legitimacy in arguing over this topic". (See flat earthers, neo-nazis, ancient aliens, etc).

In short, arguing with them only benefits them and harms you and any spectators. Dismiss them for the jerks they are and focus your efforts on those who are genuine in their approach.

Well, it's not like you can distinguish one group from the other easily, more often that not people are arguing not to exchange information but because they think they are right and they are on their holy mission to convert everyone.

Nowadays it feels like 90% of discussions are just meaningless, noone will change the opinion, because they do not care about the other person, just forcing their beliefs into someone.