???????????? what are you talking about? we saw her kiss a dude in the past when MC was a kid???????? and then again during the door????????? or are you going to suddenly tell me that spit string was complete and utter bullshit via some coping?????
You can ignore the signs of her sleeping around all you want but I def won't because like the other dude said where there's smoke etc
???????????? what are you talking about? we saw her
looking like she kissed a dude in the past when MC was a kid???????? and then again during the door????????? or are you going to suddenly tell me that you explicitly saw her giving tongue action to multiple guys behind that solid opaque wall via some coping?????
Well, can you?
At best, it
implies that she kissed someone in those instances, that only means she "may or may not" have kissed someone, and that's the reason why we are in this mess of a situation in the first place. While it looks likely, it's not clear that she did, or didn't.
Do you
not understand why I kept using the word "explicitly"?
It means very clear, very specific, not implied,
direct.
While it's very likely that she did kissed a dude in the past when MC was a kid (though that would be of no real importance in the present day), the one by the door has more leeway for whatever bs the author can come up with as the alternative.
What we CAN confirm are the times Luna's lips made contact with Naoto's. We cannot deny those didn't happen because they were
directly shown to be actually happening to the readers,
NOT HIDDEN by the "camera angle", or a wall, or merely being someone's imagination.
You can ignore the signs the author is deliberately making things ambiguous all you want but I def won't because
correlation does not imply causation. As long as there's wiggle room for the author to somehow bullshit their way out of that scenario, then I will
continue to withhold my verdict.
Her possibly having had a partner in the past does not mean she is a slut in the present. It just meant she possibly had a partner in the past.
The only way she MIGHT not be sleeping around now or in the past is if the author comes up with some MISUNDERSTANDING bullshit like I stated b4 in that yea she wasn't sleeping around it ONLY seemed like it, the sleeping moaning wasn't seggs or masturbation it was her using the massage on her shoulders and her feeling good, the spit string wasn't a kiss it was her eating something etc aka bullshit misunderstandings
That's exactly it.
The fact that you can even think that
A REASON she might not be sleeping around is because of a MISUNDERSTANDING bullshit, is all it takes.
An
alternative explanation still exists, it is still a possibility, no matter how improbable it is, it
could still be the truth. The same could be said the other way round, it is still a possibility that Luna is a slut.
All of this is because the author refused to explicitly show what actually happened.