Mangadex to purge titles for legal reasons

Contributor
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
1,500
Titles being removed are those we have been made aware of through a legal nexus as "considered the distribution of illegal material". Moderation will not go beyond the titles mentioned; there was Papa Milk and anything adjacent, and some others still in review.

If we are notified of anything else, we will try to inform uploaders before proceeding with removals, where possible.
What legal nexus? Illegal how and where?
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
53
You must be mistaking the US with Australia and UK. And for that matter, mistaking the loud, but politically powerful voices of a few religious extremists as representing the views of the whole country.

The whole Texas argument is absurd, as their law is so broad that it's unenforceable anyway. Worst case, just blacklist Texas IPs and make them use VPNs like most of Europe already needs anyway.

edit: this whole situation is also extra ironic given that MD was literally founded by a scanlation group that focused on loli manga.
It is liberals who are pushing for censoring lolis, in order to "protect women" and "stop misogyny" and "stop the male gaze".

Just like how Joseph Lieberman and Herbert Kohl had pushed in the 90s for laws to ban violent video games:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993–94_United_States_Senate_hearings_on_video_games

But people completely forgot about that, they only remember Jack Thompson, who was a complete nobody that everybody ignored and laughed at.

People falsely believe that censorship only comes from right-wing religious groups, but that's completely incorrect.
 

Lud

Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Oct 26, 2023
Messages
3
"3.1.1 Illegal Content, in particular, child pornography, child abuse and drug abuse"
This is the clause; so you're telling me that this website has to abide and delete all manga that depicts underage characters being sexualized, being abused and general drug abuse if someone demands it?
That's a death sentence, good riddance though.
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
143
Jumping back here because my previous post had a sentence that was poorly worded and came off as too much of a personal attack or moral grandstanding. I also didn't provide enough context on the content being removed, so that's on me.

I've been reading some of the replies, and thank you for voicing your opinions and concerns, whether in this thread or elsewhere. Users want clarification on the removals, so please find it below.

We were made aware of content that goes against our content policy, specifically clause 3.1.1 regarding underage characters in pornographic settings. The content that was removed, and some content still being reviewed, includes entries labelled Mature, with characters that are engaging in sexual intercourse and either:
  • They are clearly very young in appearance, and the content does not confirm that they are adults.
  • The content itself confirms that they are under the age of 18.
Nothing else is being examined at this time. We're currently exploring options to retain the title entry and other non-infringing metadata, but for now, we need to proceed with the removal.
Move your legal representation from the UK to somewhere else bruh, also i doubt you will understand this since you can't separate fiction from reality either, just like their retarded government officials
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
20
Sooner or later stuff that is not necessarily porn but with depictions of violence and sexual themes like Maou no Hajimekata are surely going to be purged.

Jumping back here because my previous post had a sentence that was poorly worded and came off as too much of a personal attack or moral grandstanding. I also didn't provide enough context on the content being removed, so that's on me.

I've been reading some of the replies, and thank you for voicing your opinions and concerns, whether in this thread or elsewhere. Users want clarification on the removals, so please find it below.

We were made aware of content that goes against our content policy, specifically clause 3.1.1 regarding underage characters in pornographic settings. The content that was removed, and some content still being reviewed, includes entries labelled Mature, with characters that are engaging in sexual intercourse and either:
  • They are clearly very young in appearance, and the content does not confirm that they are adults.
  • The content itself confirms that they are under the age of 18.
Nothing else is being examined at this time. We're currently exploring options to retain the title entry and other non-infringing metadata, but for now, we need to proceed with the removal.
Thats some corporate ass response on a site that is pretty much a crowd maintained platform fed with content from voluntary scalation groups.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
5,180
"3.1.1 Illegal Content, in particular, child pornography, child abuse and drug abuse"
This is the clause; so you're telling me that this website has to abide and delete all manga that depicts underage characters being sexualized, being abused and general drug abuse if someone demands it?
That's a death sentence, good riddance though.
RIP takopi no genzai, oyasumu punpun... Oh wait DMCA remove them right?
 
Contributor
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Messages
187
Titles being removed are those we have been made aware of through a legal nexus as "considered the distribution of illegal material". Moderation will not go beyond the titles mentioned; there was Papa Milk and anything adjacent, and some others still in review.

If we are notified of anything else, we will try to inform uploaders before proceeding with removals, where possible.
So just to clarify... should we leave it entirely up to staff review? If future moderation decisions are made, will uploaders be penalized retroactively? Or will there be some kind of cutoff date where prior uploads won’t result in strikes?

I’m asking because predictability matters. If policies are evolving, it would help to know whether enforcement is forward-looking or if older content is at risk.

On a separate note, I think section 3.1.1 could be worded more transparently. If the driving factor here is compliance with payment processor requirements, it may be better to state that directly rather than framing it purely as a legality issue.

After all, legality varies widely by region... there are countries where LGBT content is illegal, yet that’s clearly not the standard being applied here. I'm betting this constraint is specifically tied to Visa/Mastercard policies, clarity about that would avoid confusion and speculation.

It is what it is... platforms have to operate within their financial constraints. I just think being upfront about the reasoning would go a long way.
 
Double-page supporter
Joined
Feb 5, 2025
Messages
9
I gotta say I'm mostly grateful you had the bravery to do a more professional take on this, but I now know what is the sentiment you hold so it barely fixes what I think about all of this and for the matter what most people think about this matter.
I know partially the issues are because hosting services are getting peer pressured to eliminate "wrong stuff" it's happening all over the internet, and before saying I'm exagerating you can just look up how much since 2020, there's something pushing back backwater dog ass rethorics onto positions of power, the same positions of power that have been visiting certain someone's island for the past 4 decades.
But hey now cartoons are the issue, despite Japan being the country with the least SA cases including adults and including the possibility of a huge % of non reported cases they still clear every single country in the world that is big enough to statistically matter, surely this order done by those previously mentioned rich and elites to hosting services, credit cards and private companies to censor no no stuff and push a harsh demonization and dehumanization to these themes will prevent tragedies like that ever to happen again (JE was a middleman and was used as an scapegoat).

RIP this manga guys and jojo part 9 too

Both have drugs in it
If they kill mahou sensou I'm going nuclear, also yeah some a few jojos parts could potentially get hit by this retarded rules, all they had to do is to remake it to literally explain only realistic art or maybe some very specific circumstances like inciting to commit a crime only are being affected. But I feel that moderation discretion is the most dumb way to do things. One year you could have literally Ned Flanders as headmod and have to delete 80% of shit for no reason, then if they decide that the headmod was stupid all the damage is already done.
I can't believe the generation that grew up on south park and old simpsons is acting like the people the show was kind of making fun all the times (Preachy goody-2-shoes zealots and unfair attacks to freedom and art) was the way to go, it's unironically the "1984 was a warning not an instruction manual" situation, and I hate to use that book because people misuse it all the time so it has a bad rep, but all these "issues" with moral content come from people I mentioned in the first paragraph

holy text wall :korone:
Wall texting in a forum? What kind of crazyness is this! Forum are for long talks, if you want quick snappy texts you go to discord.
---------
Also before like saying I'm some faceless guy that made an account this account was actually created in 2019 but also I've been using the site even longer anyway, just didn't care too much about posting anywhere so I think the date below my user poorly reflects who I am Exact date
 
Last edited:
Double-page supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2023
Messages
8
Mangadex must die then, I hope the worst for them
"muh moral, law nshiet"
it's a pirate site about drawing, stand your ground faggot, act like a man you bitch, now ban me faggot, don't care lmao, the uk is a irrelevant shithole anyway, hope for the whole mangadex team to become homeless and live under a bridge
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2026
Messages
2
How it felt watching @Manko-sensei and @Angry_Panda fight in this thread.

Screenshot_20260216_000036_YouTube_ReVanced.jpg


Extremely disappointed in the latter though. I won't elaborate on this the thread was enough
 
Contributor
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
1,500
It is liberals who are pushing for censoring lolis, in order to "protect women" and "stop misogyny" and "stop the male gaze".

Just like how Joseph Lieberman and Herbert Kohl had pushed in the 90s for laws to ban violent video games:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993–94_United_States_Senate_hearings_on_video_games

But people completely forgot about that, they only remember Jack Thompson, who was a complete nobody that everybody ignored and laughed at.

People falsely believe that censorship only comes from right-wing religious groups, but that's completely incorrect.
I remember when being right-wing included being pro-free speech / anti-censorship. How the times have changed. Though I mostly blame the US 2-party system for this, there are too many political issues to shoehorn everyone's beliefs into one of two opposing groups.
 
Double-page supporter
Joined
Dec 13, 2024
Messages
87
Sometimes public actions are taken due to policy changes before we've had the chance to completely communicate the changes. While this could be improved to some degree, some matters can put the site's longevity at risk, so it should be somewhat understandable that some titles disappeared before we've had the chance to work out how to word an extra rule or support channel reply. We're not intentionally trying to keep people in the dark about this.

I also believe it's pointless to debate the existance of tags, personal staff opinions, or morality of the content. We just can't have it on the site going forward, it is what it is. It'll be gradually removed as mods get notified, no one's getting retroactively mod-actioned over it, just don't add it anymore.
This website has been going downhill for a while now. And those out-of-touch staff only assure us that the future is even more grim. And now, they're doing things in the dark. It's about time to jump ship and let them enjoy the millions of dollars of ad revenue they'd enjoy when everyone is out.

I don't like telling people what to do, but if you're a supporter and care about the issue, you can just stop donating.

A piracy website pretending to have a moral ground, what a fucking joke. Having lolis didn't hurt anyone, but your damned theft, pretty sure, hurt authors and their families.
 
Last edited:
Double-page supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2023
Messages
8
This website has been going downhill for a while now. And those out-of-touch staff only assure us that the future is even more grim. And now, they're doing things in the dark. It's about time to jump ship and let them enjoy the millions of dollars of ad revenue they'd enjoy when everyone is out.

When a piracy website pretends to have a moral ground, what a fucking joke. Having lolis didn't hurt anyone, but your damned theft, pretty sure, hurt authors and their families.
B-b-but muh feelings ? muh illegal drawings ?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top