Zatsuyougakari to shite Yado de Hatarakihajimeta Renkinjutsushi, Kanbanmusume-tachi to Issho ni Kurasu koto ni natta - Ch. 2

Supporter
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,284
Please, can we skip the usual shenanigans and let her be a little more honest, early?
20240829012313-1c2489ac.gif
 
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2023
Messages
6
I like tsundere, but this tsundere character is quite annoying, I’m curious to see how she’ll react when other women eventually approach the MC
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
486
Most men are tired with bs and waste of time nowadays so, tsunderes are now very annoying, we like people who are straight to the point
I dunno man, seeing people lose their shit over the rule 63 malfoy trend makes me think the market for tsunderes is still more than big enough. I'd chalk this case up to the author not bothering to put much effort into striking a balance between the tsun and the dere parts of the character, and just banking on us being distracted by her looks until they get around to having her "softening up" moments.
Also, earlier this year I replayed some dating sims/visual novels from the "golden age of tsunderes" and I noticed that the classic ones from back then are Tsun way less often than modern ones. In fact, most of them are likeable, even if somewhat aloof, to everyone (mc included) like 90% of the time and only bust out the Tsun when they get embarrassed/angry.
Which leads me to the conclusion that modern authors are just lazy and trying to copy what others did that worked without knowing why it worked, and thus missing the point entirely.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
3,298
I dunno man, seeing people lose their shit over the rule 63 malfoy trend makes me think the market for tsunderes is still more than big enough. I'd chalk this case up to the author not bothering to put much effort into striking a balance between the tsun and the dere parts of the character, and just banking on us being distracted by her looks until they get around to having her "softening up" moments.
Also, earlier this year I replayed some dating sims/visual novels from the "golden age of tsunderes" and I noticed that the classic ones from back then are Tsun way less often than modern ones. In fact, most of them are likeable, even if somewhat aloof, to everyone (mc included) like 90% of the time and only bust out the Tsun when they get embarrassed/angry.
Which leads me to the conclusion that modern authors are just lazy and trying to copy what others did that worked without knowing why it worked, and thus missing the point entirely.
makes sense, it's indeed the author not being experienced at handling their characters traits
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
486
A fuel that burns hotter would last for a shorter time for the same mass, because it means it reacts faster with oxygen. Just because it's magic doesn't mean it has to be totally nonsensical in all regards...
I was thinking the same thing but then remembered that coke, the fuel, can burn almost twice as long coal and coal burns longer than wood. I highly doubt that this author intended that, but maybe they half-remembered something to that effect and just sloppily threw it in as a throw away detail?:wooow:
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 23, 2024
Messages
1,586
I was thinking the same thing but then remembered that coke, the fuel, can burn almost twice as long coal and coal burns longer than wood. I highly doubt that this author intended that, but maybe they half-remembered something to that effect and just sloppily threw it in as a throw away detail?:wooow:
Definetly not pound-for-pound. Coke is more energy dense than coal so it can supply more heat in total, but it won't burn longer on avarage than the same amount of coal. There are several variables to the conditions under which it is burned so I'll avoid blanket statements here, however due to it being more porous than coal, you can expect if to burn out faster simply due to the rate at which the reaction runs.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
486
Definetly not pound-for-pound. Coke is more energy dense than coal so it can supply more heat in total, but it won't burn longer on avarage than the same amount of coal. There are several variables to the conditions under which it is burned so I'll avoid blanket statements here, however due to it being more porous than coal, you can expect if to burn out faster simply due to the rate at which the reaction runs.
I don't remember where I got info originally, feels like it was some documentary, but ai summary said this and linked me this video:
coke-goated.png



you seem to know more about this than I so your word is probably more reliable than an ai summary and a short yt video, but I think that actually only makes my case about "half-remembered" information being sloppily thrown in. :pepehmm:
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
3,097
Close enough, welcome back Amagami sisters
(with a side of Capitalism, ho!)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top