I couldn’t find the detailed information on the topic, but your comment aligns with my assumption that in Imperial China, paper money was enforced by the government, while in the West, it was adapted by the people first, then by the country later.
Kinda? Fiat currency was still started by the government. Paper money was started by the people so to speak, but it wasn't quite money, but more like bearer bonds. It was a certificate "This paper can be exchanged for X amount of gold/silver with this bankimg organization/merchant guild/goldsmith organization*".
People then just traded the certificates, because precious metal is heavy, inconvenient, and much harder to keep safe, specially when traveling, not to mention often easier to sneakily debase or shave of pieces. That's also why notes are traditionally for larger denominations than coinage.
The process went, the government mostly took over, with the gold standard, and the US managed to be large enough and have it's central bang be trusted enough that everyone just used us dollars internationally instead of each trying their own gold reserves.
Then amidst economic crisis and other issues, the US basically decided that they weren't going to further accept trades of dollars for the gold it was supposed to be backed by, thus ending their gold standard. And the global economy was too dolarized for anyone to really just drop it as the international medium of trade, and thus actual fiat currency became the standard, specially as other countries also followed it's lead (or has abandoned it already due to major internal crisis pushing them to print more and more money, hyperinflation be damned).
* Successful large goldsmithing guilds, families, and other organizations already had the logistics and infrastructure to handle pretty large amounts of gold, theirs and other people's, so they had lot of synergy to get into banking too.
Fusion edit:
Except that's EXACTLY what governments with fiat currency do: they conjure money out of thin air to pay for shit they want done and don't have the money to do. They call it "quantitative easing" but it's really just "money printer go BRRRRR".
In the past they did that by minting coins with a lower content of gold and silver; obtaining the exact same results, I might add...
At the end of the day, the world as a whole is still using the gold standard: "inflation" and "gold price rising" are just other ways to say your paper money isn't actually worth shit.
Yes. That's a bit of an oversimplification, but yes,
governments can in fact just print money out of whole cloth (in a fiat currency system).
Key word here is "governments", and that has nothing to do with the fractional banking system and simply about the governmental monopoly in the creation of new currency (again, in fiat currency systems).
Banks still don't lend out money out of thin air. They can only lend money that they either have or that it has been entrusted to them to lend out. Once it does get loaned out and used it will likely get deposited back into the banking system, yes, and that deposited also get part of it loaned out, and so forth, which is where the banks "multiply" money supply, but it's still existing money.