Mangadex to purge titles for legal reasons

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
4,501
1542482440-tomokofleur3.png

Could be that people are busy reaching out to the relevant authorities regarding MANGADEX UK LTD (Company number 16623153) and it's director Henry Hanxuan LIN (who is also the director for NAMICOMI UK LTD, Company number 14310809) regarding their flagrant disregard of UK Copyright Laws, International Copyright Laws, and knowingly hosting content deemed obscene by the U.K. High Court.

Note: all info is public and available on https://www.endole.co.uk/ and https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/
I give them 5 minutes before giving up, tbh.
Not that this would go anywhere, Lul
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
425
Could be that people are busy reaching out to the relevant authorities regarding MANGADEX UK LTD (Company number 16623153) and it's director Henry Hanxuan LIN (who is also the director for NAMICOMI UK LTD, Company number 14310809) regarding their flagrant disregard of UK Copyright Laws, International Copyright Laws, and knowingly hosting content deemed obscene by the U.K. High Court.

Note: all info is public and available on https://www.endole.co.uk/ and https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/
Or it's getting late (In my case almost 2am)?
 
Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2020
Messages
2
Just nuke the entire website at this point before the greedy corporate hijacker can successfully make profit off of the community's years of hard work. Mangadex is already a husk of a website after the DMCA purge anyway.
 
Aggregator gang
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Messages
45
all of their message just sound so fucking childish lmao
yea but it dosent help that mods arnt caring, the user mylovenovels tried getting them to delete this entire thread, and ontop of it whats apperently a upper Mod Grogzilla just thinks its tireing and dosent even want to mess with it so we have mods that are to low to know anything not able to help then we have whats suppose to be a super Mod which is 1 step up that dosent even feel bothered enough to give any info
 
Aggregator gang
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Messages
45
For clarity, xnot is a developer, EtherealNeko is an admin, Grog is a mod.

edit: I'm pretty sure all mods have super mod title?
just looked and yea they apperently do....i wonder if its just flair that was added onto Mod or something
 
Group Leader
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
4,156
I did export all my library out thanks to the tools previously mentioned here but I also plan on manually typing out everything just in case so I can get a manual copy for myself since I only did a MAL .xml thingie and I'd rather be able to browse between them easier on like a word document.

Now as for Xnot's latest response... Bleh dude you suck and won't satisfy us with none of your answers. And EtherealNeko, you've already showed your true face, you vile scum.
 
Purple Loli Behind the Slaughter
Joined
Apr 11, 2024
Messages
3,812
incase noone has been to other chats yall should go check out the last 8 pages of Casual chatting thread they think this is just a joke and that Xnot and Etheral were here talking just cause they got the short end of the the stick and had to deal with it
Also if I could please direct everyone's' attention to https://forums.mangadex.org/threads/casual-chatting-thread.1901352
Several moderators are active in here and insulting all of us!
It's fair game given we are talking shit about them here. Doesn't make make the BS they pulled any better tho
To all the people who have entered my thread, are currently visiting my thread, have previously looked through the thread, or considering looking through the thread:

Please. I implore you. Keep discussions about this topic in my thread to a minimum.

Firstly, because @RogueKitsune said so:
PS: Keep all discussion about this in this thread and out of the support forum.

Secondly, because it breaks Rule 3.5 of the Forums:
Terms and Rules said:

And thirdly:
My thread is meant to be a safe space for people to talk freely about harmless, fun topics that shouldn't affect the forums or the main site. I only ask you to maintain some civility there. I will not tolerate anything that breaks Rule 1 of the forums.

As for me and this whole debacle, I wish to be neutral towards all this, though I cannot guarantee I won't make any statements that might anger the general populace of this thread.

Now, are we clear?
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jul 16, 2023
Messages
19
To all the people who have entered my thread, are currently visiting my thread, have previously looked through the thread, or considering looking through the thread:

Please. I implore you. Do not discuss about this topic in my thread.

Firstly, because @RogueKitsune said so:


Secondly, because it breaks Rule 3.5 of the Forums:


And thirdly:
My thread is meant to be a safe space for people to talk freely about harmless, fun topics that shouldn't affect the forums or the main site. I only ask you to maintain some civility there. I will not tolerate anything that breaks Rule 1 of the forums.

As for me and this whole debacle, I wish to be neutral towards all this, though I cannot guarantee I won't make any statements that might anger the general populace of this thread.

Now, are we clear?
"My thread is meant to be a safe space"
WHAT ARE YOU? 15?
 
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
15
If you believe there is anything wrong with what you quoted, spell it out. I don't mind replying if people are being civil, but if you're just gonna vaguepost and insult me you're just getting banned.
I see... so Schizo-Neko insulting users by calling/implying they are pedos is fine... but others insulting you gets the ban hammer. How wonderfully biased you are. 🙄
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Dec 20, 2024
Messages
12
Jumping back here because my previous post had a sentence that was poorly worded and came off as too much of a personal attack or moral grandstanding. I also didn't provide enough context on the content being removed, so that's on me.

I've been reading some of the replies, and thank you for voicing your opinions and concerns, whether in this thread or elsewhere. Users want clarification on the removals, so please find it below.

We were made aware of content that goes against our content policy, specifically clause 3.1.1 regarding underage characters in pornographic settings. The content that was removed, and some content still being reviewed, includes entries labelled Mature, with characters that are engaging in sexual intercourse and either:
  • They are clearly very young in appearance, and the content does not confirm that they are adults.
  • The content itself confirms that they are under the age of 18.
Nothing else is being examined at this time. We're currently exploring options to retain the title entry and other non-infringing metadata, but for now, we need to proceed with the removal.
Called it, they were preparing another damage control post
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Top