Koori no Hime wa Chiisana Hidamari de Tokasaretai - Vol. 4 Ch. 28

[deleted-user-94bfc63407]

Fair point, though I'm not sure why you have to label yourself an "autsist" to justify continuing the conversation.
You could have frankly left it at you are generally committed to seeking constructive discourse and your point would've been just as valid.

That said, your opinion and preferences are your own, and you're more than allowed to have those and see them remain inviolate. I would caution that you can't control what others do on the Internet, and asking them to refrain is your prerogative, but it's no guarantee that they'll honor you request, nor are they obligated to do so.
Just as you wish to not see "venomous and perverted internet discourse", others are not always going to see eye-to-eye with you. If they're doing it specifically to spite you, that's one thing, but unprompted as the initial offending complaint was, it might be something you just have to square yourself with going forward in not being able to wholly avoid in general-use spaces such as this.

But I also appreciate an actual back-and-forth direction conversation, earnest as you seem to be in having an actual dialogue. It'd be easy to do what @jasohn07 has been doing and simply go leaving reactions on the whole string of comments while otherwise seemingly hiding from direct engagement, and so I figured I'd at least respond in good faith to your efforts to actually find some meaning.

Thank you for now taking me in good faith.
Tbh, I'm aware and it doesnt matter if they honor my request.

What matters is the topic was brought up at all and it gets people questioning their etiquette and language.
Same applies to taking people in bad faith, this chain may inspire observers to be more calm, collected and positive in conversation in future as you don't always know someone's intent.

This kind of speech won't ruin my day, nor upset me particually.
But I feel an obligation to apply a little perspective on how our speech is changing subconsiously and that lines are being crossed.

There's been a similar phenomena with swearing, "Well that was fucking lame".
Cheap bonus dramatics to enhance a benign statement at the cost of discourse being made more unpleasant.
You often find yourself doing it subconsciously almost out of your own control.

It's like a subconscious rat race of trying to make ourselves sound more important than we actually are, irritating one another in the process.
Vernacular midwittery.

Thus why I questioned if it was nececary to bring up the possibility that glasses-chan "rails" her boyfriend or whether said juxtoposition could have been done without triggering such an image in other's minds, making things objectively less wholesome.

 

[arimareiji]

Fair point, though I'm not sure why you have to label yourself an "autsist" to justify continuing the conversation.
You could have frankly left it at you are generally committed to seeking constructive discourse and your point would've been just as valid.

That said, your opinion and preferences are your own, and you're more than allowed to have those and see them remain inviolate. I would caution that you can't control what others do on the Internet, and asking them to refrain is your prerogative, but it's no guarantee that they'll honor you request, nor are they obligated to do so.
Just as you wish to not see "venomous and perverted internet discourse", others are not always going to see eye-to-eye with you. If they're doing it specifically to spite you, that's one thing, but unprompted as the initial offending complaint was, it might be something you just have to square yourself with going forward in not being able to wholly avoid in general-use spaces such as this.

But I also appreciate an actual back-and-forth direction conversation, earnest as you seem to be in having an actual dialogue. It'd be easy to do what @jasohn07 has been doing and simply go leaving reactions on the whole string of comments while otherwise seemingly hiding from direct engagement, and so I figured I'd at least respond in good faith to your efforts to actually find some meaning.

It's always good to try to assume a good-faith effort to seek constructive discourse.

Personally, I see that as being less likely than a pattern of abject refusal to admit their post can be fairly paraphrased as "Saying anything I don't like 'forces' me to think about it, which is bad and you should stop saying things I don't like" — and reacting similarly to anyone who points out the contradictions in those refusals.

But not to the degree of relative certainty, which is why I'm glad someone hasn't ruled the possibility out.

 

[Kairiuk191]

Don't worry about already being good on the very start! Besides, thanks a lot for the translation, you did a very good job!

 

[dcdfvr]

Getting rejected 3 times in one confession is a new record

 

[buntbackspace]

I'll come to hear your formal answer another time

From Himuro's perspective, if Mizudori had said "Yes" to any of his attempts it would be a formal answer, but "No" from her is never a formal answer.

That was a magnificently clean rejection, Mizudori!

It really was. But Himuro will come back to make things messy.

 

[tillua467]

Damn doesn't look like I was TL by a Rookie, Nice translation looking forward to it