I'm not here to read for other people. I quote the bits that I find important. No context is being left out because, Chii literally tells us, the readers, what their relationship status is. You got that, you can read, so I don't see why you feel offended for people that can't. Did those people somehow comment when they only read that first part and didn't read the rest? Possible, but the last chapter also ends on a flat out rejection as well. This manga isn't written in a way where a brother/sister relationship would imply possessives to a degree of not letting the other person date someone else.
As for your analysis, why do you think Tokio hasn't come to terms with their situation. To me, him entering this competition is him trying to get Chi to face him head on and get her to openly reject him so they can return to their old relationship. Or at the very least get everything out in the open after being dodged for a while. Why does he need space, when he's clearly mature enough to accept the friendship he already has?
Or why do you think it would be better for Chii to give him time when this whole arc has been about the worry of separating with others. She accepts that things change but the rejection of another person's romance doesn't have to mean that their relationship needs to change after the fact at all. Neither of them want that so, what's the problem?
In this story where the arc themes are literally write in the text it self. I don't need to quote every single line. If I'm wrong call me out on it. If you think they're subtext that I'm missing, let me have it. But this story isn't that complex. Much like Chii, it lays all of its cards out on the table.
Hey, if you think Tokio doesn't want their relationship to change after having a crush on her for what, 2/3rds of his life - I don't know how to get that point across 🤷♂️
Seriously, I only called you out on disregarding others ability to read when your argumentation is, in my eyes, flawed to begin with. I didn't say anything about the story arc or what the author
maybe wanted us readers to see/feel/comprehend.
It's just that you can't pick out only parts of what she said to bolster your argument.
I, myself, am not one of the hatera that react like a vampire seeing the dawn whenever a Chii chapter goes live.
But you got to accept that the way she phrased things it can't only be read / understood as 'We'll always be foodies and bro/sis level besties even if you get over me romantically and find someone to throw your romatical love at' as you do.
If you read
only this chapter of this series, without the 'reader' insight we all got, are you really sure you wouldn't think about what she said the way I, and many others, have pointed out?
The way she phrased her speech didn't put her in ANY type of good light. She quite literally said 'I could put you free from those feelings binding you from early childhood - but that's not how
I want things to turn out'
Tokio got NO clue about what's going on in her mind, her inner monologues this/ the last chapter(s). He just accepts it as-ia because that poor young fellow is too vulnerable and inexperienced to get what's going on and will most likely be led along for a damn long time.
Not that that's what will happen in the future - just viewing the first part of this chapter as a 'stand alone' (my argument is being watered down with the fact that you wouldn't know just HOW infatuated he is with that girl, I'm aware of that) I don't quite get how anyone would come to a conclusion like yours.
Again - I don't want to either disregard or disrespect your point of view. I just feel it's very, VERY disrespectful of you to tell poeple they can't read/ have no reading comprehension while you seemingly can't get this point of view.
Sure, I too think Chii isn't the second coming of a failing austrian artist (over the top, I know, but well...) - but she isn't Chiisus Christ Super Star either!
And the victim is oue sweet Tokio. He does deserve to
quickly get to the point where he can 'Let her go... Let her goooo' - Which her little speech didn't help with. If she had phrased it like my initial post, it'd be a different story.
Would it have been Chii like? Well, not really. Bringing across the same meaning, phrased in her words? Now THAT would have been character growth and maybe 1/3 lesser Chii hate posts 🤔