Search results

To clarify the position of 'social and comments': Social posts and post comments will be expanded to group 2. When we are confident, we can fight the betting/adult spam on posts and post comments; we will expand it to group 3. Then, and only then, will we switch title comments and chapter...

Nothing will stop any user from doing that, so you can continue to create them, yes. The title and chapter UI links will open the new system, though, so discussion will probably dry out as a result. No one can tell the future, so let's see what happens.

The forums aren't going away; we're just planning to move title and chapter commenting to the platform instead. Things will be tested and adjusted properly over time to stop needless drama. At the beginning, there might be some teething issues, but we plan to continue adjusting rather than a...

It's coming soon; we're working on it. Preparations are already underway. Thanks to everyone for their patience while we work on these QoL features.

We will provide development and roadmap updates going forward. We will try to do it once a month, but if not enough has changed, we will skip the update until the month after. We don't have an ETA on these yet, we will try to add them when possible. UI: Considering adding a page selector to...

This week, we've removed 59 titles out of approximately 109,900 titles being tracked and discussed on the platform. Some of the titles were reported by our legal and compliance department as not conforming to clause 3.1.1 of MangaDex's Content Policy, in particular, depictions of drawn young...

Titles being removed are those we have been made aware of through a legal nexus as "considered the distribution of illegal material". Moderation will not go beyond the titles mentioned; there was Papa Milk and anything adjacent, and some others still in review. If we are notified of anything...

Jumping back here because my previous post had a sentence that was poorly worded and came off as too much of a personal attack or moral grandstanding. I also didn't provide enough context on the content being removed, so that's on me. I've been reading some of the replies, and thank you for...

Any additions or uploads to the service that are not compliant will be removed as we become aware of them. As for the comment by the blue guy, read the Content Policy. It's there, has been for a while now.

Stop the misinformation. Titles being removed depict sexual activity between characters that are minors, either in appearance (handled on a case-by-case basis) or confirmed in the dialogue. It's about law and compliance with it. If you jerk it off to little kids, go and do it elsewhere; there...

You better believe it!

I picked it. What's the problem?

You don't get to decide what is and is not allowed on the platform. If the content that's allowed no longer fits your criteria, you're welcome to either not engage with it or consume your content elsewhere. That's also a simple solution.

People like to forget that there are creators behind all titles, but this is especially true for self-published. Maybe users are too desensitized or perhaps even motivated by how shitty the traditional publishers treat mangaka that they think it's okay to do that. Until the ratings stop being...

Why are you claiming the publisher is doing this when it's actually the creator doing it? That's like being upset at Patreon or Kofi because a creator gated their posts behind a subscription.

You kids have no idea how the Bayesian average works, and it shows. If you don't like the content, you can always bugger off and go read elsewhere; no one is stopping you.

NamiComi isn't an official publisher in the traditional sense. Creators upload content there directly, just like they would on MD. Drop the creator a comment that they're missing a page