Labour was far cheaper back then than it is now. Storage of milk was a bigger problem, so a lot of various milk products were developed to increase the life span of it.with a lot of labour dedicated to it
"Wasn't likely to be seen" means it's very rare. And it wasn't the case at all. It depends a lot on what time period you're talking about, and what area, but it was mainly produced by the people taking care of the cows, so it was most certainly seen by everyone. And eaten. For them, it might've been a luxury, but for the nobility? Not nearly as much.It wasn't rare, but it was uncommon enough that it wasn't likely to be seen except by the upper classes.
"Upper classes" is not just the nobility; there's entire swathes of the common folk included there, that fit within the more well-to-do bracket of society, eg. merchants or bakers. If I meant just nobility, I'd have said nobility.Labour was far cheaper back then than it is now. Storage of milk was a bigger problem, so a lot of various milk products were developed to increase the life span of it.
"Wasn't likely to be seen" means it's very rare. And it wasn't the case at all. It depends a lot on what time period you're talking about, and what area, but it was mainly produced by the people taking care of the cows, so it was most certainly seen by everyone. And eaten. For them, it might've been a luxury, but for the nobility? Not nearly as much.
shepherds, aka the people taking care of the herds of cows, would be the ones primarily having cheese aside from the upper classes, and it would primarily be the loose curds in whey form of quick cheese (which is why it's commonly known in English as "cottage cheese") rather than anything more substantial; it took cheese presses to condense curds to form cheese, and a safe place to store said cheese over a long period of time as it set and matured, and shepherds did not usually have access to such. Most peasant families would have heavy cream, instead, as the process was much simpler; the milk fat separates and condenses on the top of milk left to sit.shepherds of large flocks would be the only other people with plenty of cheese, and it'd mostly be soft cheeses made and consumed within just a few days, if not daily.
You differentiating nobility from upper classes is a non-argument, since I was talking about the lower classes, which is neither.If I meant just nobility, I'd have said nobility.
I ignore that because it's patently false. I've made butter myself. It takes work, but it doesn't take that much work.As for butter, it being a very labour-intensive process was actually a big deal, because you had to exhaust several people's worth of labour over a fairly long period of constant work to get butter; time and effort that would be better spent in other forms of labour, eg. hunting or fishing or gathering seasonal fruits and plants. As I said in the part you seem to have ignored,
It's material condition. The ruling class has the incentive to invent complicated and interconnected reason for their hold on power, mask their extraction of wealth as good and why the lower class's duty is to serve them. It's 'tradition', 'honor', 'chivalry', 'noblesse oblige', 'god's will', 'mandate of heaven' etc... And it's also the estate servant who has the incentive to deceive themselves that serving the ruling class is good, for it make them better than the other lower class people.I don't buy the tickle-down economic theory purveyed here. There's a reason elitist monarchies lead to significant stagnation in cultural and economic development.
I'm not saying "Capitalism, ho!" or anything of the sort. But the way people have been indoctrinated to portray by-blood class systems as a good thing rubs me the wrong way.
Every feudalistic society has ended in bloodshed and revolution. Either colonial, or domestically.
Until the meiji restoration cows were seen only as live stock and a draft animals in Japan. They have no history of dairy consumption so to them cheese is a luxury product, not something they saw their grandpas make with their own hands.Butter is similar to cheese. Nobles in the middle ages considered them as peasant food even though they also eat it occasionaly. But butter was a luxury during the great depression and the world war II.
They also aren't nearly as lactose tolerant as Europeans, especially the Norse.It's probably because japan as a country isn't suited for pasture. Same reason why meat in general is seen as a luxury product.
Until the meiji restoration cows were seen only as live stock and a draft animals in Japan. They have no history of dairy consumption so to them cheese is a luxury product, not something they saw their grandpas make with their own hands.
It's probably because japan as a country isn't suited for pasture. Same reason why meat in general is seen as a luxury product.
Even though the language was in Japan (because this is a manga), wasn't the game's setting magical version of European middle ages? Which was why the names, the food, and the dress were European-like?They also aren't nearly as lactose tolerant as Europeans, especially the Norse.
Meat has been more or less a luxury depending on time and place. Here in Scandinavia where the population was (and is) low and forests were plentiful, hunting was more prominent. There are also lots of land not suitable for farming but good for grazing (the Ice Age changed the landscape quite a bit), so cattle was more common, relatively speaking.
In denser places with less wilderness like Japan and UK meat naturally becomes more expensive, since you need to prioritize land use much more. Scotland has a lot of land mostly usable for sheep, hence some local specialties involving that.
It's closer to Renaissance Europe, with many later influences, but it's through the lens of some Japanese person who probably doesn't know all that much about that time period. For instance, the riding outfit she wears at the beginning of the story is from the 1900's. Someone who's interested in architecture could probably identify the style of her mansion and date that.Even though the language was in Japan (because this is a manga), wasn't the game's setting magical version of European middle ages? Which was why the names, the food, and the dress were European-like?
Conveniently the setting is based on a fictional otome game, which of course would not be historically accurate, as these sort of games (and other Japanese fiction) have demonstrated often enough. So the manga is just accurately portraying the fictional source material by being ahistorical / historically inaccurate.It's closer to Renaissance Europe, with many later influences, but it's through the lens of some Japanese person who probably doesn't know all that much about that time period.