Power Uploader
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
- Messages
- 1,839
It has been a part of the game since ancient days which is why unlike other rule breaking actions, fouling is only met with light penalties and disciplinary actions only if the foul is severe enough. Please do explain why fouling isn't met with more severe consequences like other rule breaking actions, such as injury causing fouls, doping, deliberate handballs, spitting?Tactical foul is against the rule that’s why it’s called a foul. It doesn’t take skill to do and doesn’t make person doing it look good.
Because fouling is considered acceptable physical challenge. Genuinely never seen a single person who plays football, or as a matter of fact someone who has watched football their whole life, ever have a problem with fouling. It is literally considered strategy unless you're committing DOGSO, even then it is acceptable under circumstances. And according to the rulebook, you are presented with an equal opportunity of scoring the goal, such as a freekick or a penalty.
But clearly all of this goes over your head, because you have never played football in your life and probably only watch it to fit in with others. If you want to act as a pretender then don't go around trying to argue about the subject, you'll only get laughed at by other people.