Break New World - Ch. 19

[MangaDex]

 

[freaksho3]

The scanlation team is really living up to their names. Read one chapther and another comes up.

Thank you for the hardwork 🙏

 

[infernoWRLD]

This shit is so good man. I thought it would be another edgeslop manga but I'm really enjoying it so far.

The characters feel a bit more nuanced than the usual "Errm I'm evil and psycho i kill you now 😝"

 

[EchoGirl]

Poor Niru. But yeah considering one generation remembers a world before the system feels like there'd be weekly outbursts of rebellion on a smaller scale

wonder how many total this'll be, raws seem to go up to 30s for now

 

[zuflis11]

the girl with E also have descent. maybe everyone with latent potential to have descent are more resistant/aware instinctually how fcked up the weird the repressive system by Lowell maybe?

just a guess that maybe its connected since lowell keep trying to supress everyone and label anyone not cooperating as heretic, and anyone with descent is regarded as heretic too

 

[addisonrae]

I’m still confused 😵‍💫

 

[danbellucci]

The first chapter lade it on a bit too thick but it's gotten better since then. This is pretty good!
The government are certainly acting rationally setting a trap for the heretics by publicly executing E ranks . Does that mean Lowell was somewhere nearby speaking with his real voice?

I quite like these kinds of stories but I think they produce a big overreaction in young audiences where they think that all rules, authority, hierarchy and state are automatically bad then they waste some portion of their life with naive , utopian, juvenile ideas.
and it's a huge imbalance. there are tonnes of stories like this about how all authoritarian states are bad, and very few stories about authority-less states or anarchy is bad. Even in stories where there's a breakdown in law and order, there's rarely a connection spelled out between the character's suffering because the government lost control. Instead the character's suffering is blamed on some freak natural event (e.g. virus outbreak, natural disaster) or evil individuals , not the fact that the government has lost control and a state of anarchy has been reached a state of maximal liberty that libertarians and anarchists want. On the other hand in all of these stories it is authoritarian government itself that is thematically blamed . Simply the government being in control and restricting the freedom of the citizens is itself the source of evil in these stories.
It's an unbalanced story landscape. It's often bad when there's a government with a lot of control and people don't have freedom, it's even more often oft bad when there's anarchy because without government control there's no law and order , no services and people suffer even more. Why even more? Because even under a very controlling government, there will usually at least be enough order to sustain a large population. When there is no order and no authority then the human carrrying capacity of that area goes way down because efficiency goes way down because people's general safety is at risk and people can only make themselves secure in small local areas which means food can't be grown and distributed as efficiently and people need to spend much more on their own security which means you can't support nearly as many lives.
So actually anarchy or libertarianism is a greater source of human suffering or evil than authoritarianism, yet this is not represented thematically in the landscape of stories at all.

thanks for all the chapters

 

[KeiB]

I quite like these kinds of stories but I think they produce a big overreaction in young audiences where they think that all rules, authority, hierarchy and state are automatically bad then they waste some portion of their life with naive , utopian, juvenile ideas.
and it's a huge imbalance. there are tonnes of stories like this about how all authoritarian states are bad, and very few stories about authority-less states or anarchy is bad. Even in stories where there's a breakdown in law and order, there's rarely a connection spelled out between the character's suffering because the government lost control. Instead the character's suffering is blamed on some freak natural event (e.g. virus outbreak, natural disaster) or evil individuals , not the fact that the government has lost control and a state of anarchy has been reached a state of maximal liberty that libertarians and anarchists want. On the other hand in all of these stories it is authoritarian government itself that is thematically blamed . Simply the government being in control and restricting the freedom of the citizens is itself the source of evil in these stories.
It's an unbalanced story landscape. It's often bad when there's a government with a lot of control and people don't have freedom, it's even more often oft bad when there's anarchy because without government control there's no law and order , no services and people suffer even more. Why even more? Because even under a very controlling government, there will usually at least be enough order to sustain a large population. When there is no order and no authority then the human carrrying capacity of that area goes way down because efficiency goes way down because people's general safety is at risk and people can only make themselves secure in small local areas which means food can't be grown and distributed as efficiently and people need to spend much more on their own security which means you can't support nearly as many lives.
So actually anarchy or libertarianism is a greater source of human suffering or evil than authoritarianism, yet this is not represented thematically in the landscape of stories at all.

100 social credit points have been added to your account!

 

[GetRekdm8]

Poor Niru. But yeah considering one generation remembers a world before the system feels like there'd be weekly outbursts of rebellion on a smaller scale

Except not really. As some of the characters already showed it's very easy to just go along with the flow and never question sweeping censorship of media and overreach. It's happening to our society at large, but almost no one gives AF because the status quo of mindlessly consuming media and chasing current trends is enough to satiate 99% of people. The people who do care are called all manners of buzzwords to be silenced, at best, and are jailed or disappeared at worst depending on what country you live in currently.

Like another poster pointed out in one of the other discussions here the UK is approaching this state alarmingly fast, it's got almost all of the framework in place. We all know China does the social credit stuff too, and with several similar punishments if yours is low, like travel bans, denial of services, financial restrictions and higher rates, no access to high speed internet, etc.

If caring about censorship and the like wasn't frowned upon by the masses who just want to simply escape their hellish lives with substances and sports/news/social media after work this stuff wouldn't even be entertained today, but it's slowly but surely being put in place. It's literally the wet dream of all our economic and political leaders, btw. They've all waxed lyrical about making the world as a whole a surveillance state nightmare for the common man so "everyone is on their best behavior" (verbatim what they said).

 

[SkyKing5674]

The first chapter lade it on a bit too thick but it's gotten better since then. This is pretty good!
The government are certainly acting rationally setting a trap for the heretics by publicly executing E ranks . Does that mean Lowell was somewhere nearby speaking with his real voice?

I quite like these kinds of stories but I think they produce a big overreaction in young audiences where they think that all rules, authority, hierarchy and state are automatically bad then they waste some portion of their life with naive , utopian, juvenile ideas.
and it's a huge imbalance. there are tonnes of stories like this about how all authoritarian states are bad, and very few stories about authority-less states or anarchy is bad. Even in stories where there's a breakdown in law and order, there's rarely a connection spelled out between the character's suffering because the government lost control. Instead the character's suffering is blamed on some freak natural event (e.g. virus outbreak, natural disaster) or evil individuals , not the fact that the government has lost control and a state of anarchy has been reached a state of maximal liberty that libertarians and anarchists want. On the other hand in all of these stories it is authoritarian government itself that is thematically blamed . Simply the government being in control and restricting the freedom of the citizens is itself the source of evil in these stories.
It's an unbalanced story landscape. It's often bad when there's a government with a lot of control and people don't have freedom, it's even more often oft bad when there's anarchy because without government control there's no law and order , no services and people suffer even more. Why even more? Because even under a very controlling government, there will usually at least be enough order to sustain a large population. When there is no order and no authority then the human carrrying capacity of that area goes way down because efficiency goes way down because people's general safety is at risk and people can only make themselves secure in small local areas which means food can't be grown and distributed as efficiently and people need to spend much more on their own security which means you can't support nearly as many lives.
So actually anarchy or libertarianism is a greater source of human suffering or evil than authoritarianism, yet this is not represented thematically in the landscape of stories at all.

thanks for all the chapters

There's reason democracy exist,it is authoritian government that is choosen by citizen,but Democracy has been distorted so much it became capitalism and Dictatorship nowaday

 

[Rena_Andou]

Okay so Niru have some sort of weird ADHD / Autism

 

[JaneJeon]

Except not really. As some of the characters already showed it's very easy to just go along with the flow and never question sweeping censorship of media and overreach. It's happening to our society at large, but almost no one gives AF because the status quo of mindlessly consuming media and chasing current trends is enough to satiate 99% of people. The people who do care are called all manners of buzzwords to be silenced, at best, and are jailed or disappeared at worst depending on what country you live in currently.

Like another poster pointed out in one of the other discussions here the UK is approaching this state alarmingly fast, it's got almost all of the framework in place. We all know China does the social credit stuff too, and with several similar punishments if yours is low, like travel bans, denial of services, financial restrictions and higher rates, no access to high speed internet, etc.

If caring about censorship and the like wasn't frowned upon by the masses who just want to simply escape their hellish lives with substances and sports/news/social media after work this stuff wouldn't even be entertained today, but it's slowly but surely being put in place. It's literally the wet dream of all our economic and political leaders, btw. They've all waxed lyrical about making the world as a whole a surveillance state nightmare for the common man so "everyone is on their best behavior" (verbatim what they said).

You got a loicense for that criticism, m8? Ofcom would like to have a word with you... in private. We are sending the Met to your location. Please do not resist.