No, nobody can be expected to be able to flawlessly handle ~300 three-year olds. No matter their gender or sex.a cis woman would be expected by the reader how to childrear.
No, nobody can be expected to be able to flawlessly handle ~300 three-year olds. No matter their gender or sex.a cis woman would be expected by the reader how to childrear.
Well I do like that this chapter acknowledged that Reisu hadn't even processed it.Sometimes I wonder if there was even a point making the protagonist a reincarnated character, much less a genderbent one.
It works even in real life!I see, so the secret to befriending them is to be bald!
brb shaving my head
That's because in most cases women are just people, but they're rarely treated as such in fiction and both extremes (women as very simple or very ✨unique✨) are kinda sexist because they refuse to see how, at the end of the day, women are just people with dreams and goals and rich inner lives that aren't too different from men's. The only time there is a meaningful difference is if you are trying to reflect the gender dynamics of the real world which are definitely messy and someone who hasn't been on the receiving end of systemic sexism might not fully comprehend all the ways in which it can affect you.really ? its not sexist it really HARD write female character come on man its everything we say in internet is wrong? Many author like kishimoto and haruki got hate because they create female flat or one-dimensional female characters. i see woman as special and unique character only woman themselves can understand to create. . . i see woman as special but you see i am sexist . . . really. that why mangaka or novelist hire female assistant to help them creating good female character. nope its reality Editor in japan always strict about female protagonist in novel and manga. and for man character you can always one dimensional motivation for story (well as people say Men general motive always simple)