Talk about a jumpscare, I completely forgot this existed.
Your "thought experiment" is not relevant because it "proves" that men would feel the same as women by assuming that men would feel the same as a woman by giving the example of a woman. As i said, not having the burden of pregnancy and having testosterone dependant traits makes the dynamic of those encounters different.
The thought experiment doesn't prove that....like at all. You're literally just avoiding thinking about it because it's counter to your argument.
You pointed out people who were giving advice to avoid them. Which is a minority talking to a minority of all people interacting with them in the first place. You can point as many microphenomena as you want, that doesn't make a general rule.
Neither you nor I have the statistics to describe them as a minority or majority, let's cut that thread right there. At best we've both got anecdotal evidence because no one has legitimately studied this phenomenon to that extent. The point was that I was specific about the cases I was referring to and you jumped off that to something else.
No, except for the people who will misunderstand their intention to hook up for cultural reason. Pretty much nobody has any more issues about some girl wanting to sleep with you because she liked your skin color more than her wanting to because she liked your abs and jawline.
This is verifiably false. People, in general, have always had a problem with being sex objects because of their skin color, far more than abs and jawlines. That's a fact provable by literally spending 5 minutes looking into people actually feel about being fetishized. Hell I'll spend 2 minutes, and I'll time myself just to prove it.
2 minutes 1 second and 71 milliseconds, and most of that was loading through pages.
"Japanese people know other Japanese people and they are mad at them for having a free sex life and liking foreigners better, because they are xenophobic misogynists" is what you wanted to say i guess. It's like showing me a webpage about "coalburners" and concluding that this page shows an issue being american women who are into black dudes rather than concluding that the page reflects misogyny and racism.
No one is bringing up misogyny or racism (Cept that 1 dude), why are you so fixated on that?
People who engage in those are using each other. Gaijin hunters fetishise foreigners and end up with foreigners who fetishize them almost systematically. You don't find them in spots where the blissfully unaware tourist who might be open to the love of their life might cross them.
The problem is that not every foreigner they hook up with or try to hook up with is interested in that sort of relationship. You can keep tap dancing around the specificity all you like, but they were specified for a reason. I'm not interested in talking about two consenting fetishists, what they do is their own business.
Men are systematically taller from what we are shown. Meaning that even in this world testosterone is the anabolic hormone. A child also has no developmental difference that would justify them overpowering any adult. Meaning this is played for laughs as in most manga featuring female on male abuse for slapstick. Chapter 3 shows that very clearly he is when shown seriously far more athletically gifted than even a teenager. So that's a load of dirty barnacles from you here.
Buddy, this is a manga adaptation of a novel and we're 3 chapters in (we literally haven't even met the entire cast yet). Look up the spoilers yourself since you seem to be so impatient on being wrong.
It is very much a cost, as unromantic or whatever that sounds to you, things in life have costs and they have rewards. The miracle of life is very nice to discuss from an emotional standpoint and from some philosophical aspects. From a psychologic, biologic and social standpoint, pregnancy has a steep cost. Pregnancy is vulnerability. Pregnancy is mood swings. Pregnancy is sometimes irreversible bodily consequences. Pregnancy is a non-zero risk of death. Those are costs, and men don't have to pay them during those 9 months. Replace it with "burden", "toll", "onus" if you like those better.
A
cost means you lose something to get something else and you generally don't get it back. Two of the literal definitions of cost is "Loss" and "Sacrifice" so when someone starts referring to something temporary as "Cost" then I get confused, but again, you do you.
There is no such thing as a pregnancy without cost, except if you are imagining a world where pregnancy doesn't impact their body, health or mind at all and child rearing takes care of itself magically later. The society being strictly monogamous is also not true, a guy clearly mentions offering the FMC to be his third girlfriend.
What was that you said earlier? "You can point as many microphenomena as you want, that doesn't make a general rule"? Feelin' like that works here.
At this point it really does feel like you're arguing just to argue and quite frankly I don't even think you have the life experience to have this conversation if some of the red flags you've given are to be taken at face value. So I'm gonna let you get your last word in, because I know that's what you want, and head out because we're derailing at this point.