And all of those benefits you're talking about are the publisher's literal job.
You consider "Actively sniping artists and their works off a single publishing house" a benefit or did you skip that part of the argument? Because I put that part on bold for a good reason.
they're actively using blacklisting as a behavioral control
Uh... can you point me which part of the manga you're referring to by this? Because AFAIK within the story so far, the blacklist is used as a stake in the competition and not swung around as a threat for regular artists.
If you're referring its usage as a stake in the competition as behavioral control, you're wrong. Because:
Within the competition, the blacklist is temporary because it is an
"unorthodox penalty". It is mentioned that there's only 1 person being perma-blacklisted, because they are actively sniping Shounen Wonder's most popular artist, which endangers that single publishing house itself. You can see the logic right?
If you're referring to the
existence of the blacklist itself is being used a behavioral control by them, then frankly i don't see your point because there is no basis for this. So far within the story, there is exactly zero mention of them misusing it. Every company be it fictional or IRL have some form of a blacklist, because a
company reserve the right to hire, fire and refuse to hire someone. Y'know, the same way an applicant reserve the right to apply for, accept or deny a job offer.
I would've agreed with you if there were mentions of them misusing it, but there weren't. So that train of thought is baseless.
money is tight for these artists even on a weekly/monthly basis and they have to become assistant artists to keep the lights on.
That's just reality dude lmao.
The fact that our MC was an exception where they made sure it wouldn't make it impossible to feed themselves implies that everyone else they temporarily blacklist is expected to fall into poverty and/or desperately struggle to survive on a different job with what probably amounts to zero warning?
1. MC was essentially not an exception. Even
IF you consider the deputy editor referring the MC to other publishing houses as an exception, it is due to the nature of the blacklist as a
gameshow punishment instead of a normal blacklist.
2. MC (And everyone else that is blacklisted whether temp or perma) is free to carry his own works as portfolio to other publishing houses for work. There is no basis to assume otherwise.
3. There is no indication that they're misusing the blacklist, therefore no indications of foul play.
4. You forgot to consider that anyone else that have been temp-banned might have done something deserving of it, and you are making an assumption that they're not taking the risks of being blacklisted into consideration.
5. If one were to get blacklisted from a company, unless they've done something that'd immediately paint the company itself in bad picture to public eyes (i.e something criminal like raping a child), did you not consider that one will get more than sufficient amount of warning beforehand? Because it seems that you didn't.
And lastly, I'd like to reiterate that
It is not hypocritical for an EDITOR-IN-CHIEF to paint someone that threatened to KILL THEIR MAGAZINE as EVIL to HIS EDITOR SUBORDINATES. Like i said. It's subjective.
If you're reading this, congrats and thanks for reading ig lmao