Double-page supporter
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2018
- Messages
- 83
did the dad not check if his employee was doing his job❔ like ever❔❔
From what it seems, going to the club with a goblin.Wheretf your soldier or knight???
You were also using conjectures, you know. "Could have" and "assumptions" can't be helped in this case.
Taking MC as a kid doesn't make him much closer than a stranger if he did nothing more to make them closer. He could have taken MC on a whim, momentary charity by making an unfortunate kid a servant boy. It's quite common.
Even if he didn't ask other people, normally testimonies from just his son and his aide would be enough. Asking for more testimony would mean that he don't actually love/trust those people. We know he loves his asshole son, and he obviously trusted the aide, or why else he would make that man his aide?
It doesn't matter if the fang was real. MC was accused of stealing. That proof could have been prepared by MC using the stolen money. Even searching MC's room wouldn't be enough, because MC could have hidden the stash somewhere else. Once again, words of his dear son and trusted aide against the words of a stranger.
His animosity towards MC was the reason why I said that his mind was poisoned by the son and the aide. Another proof that his relationship with MC was not close and their interactions were minimal if not nonexistant.
But like I said, it didn't mean that he should get a second chance. Mistakes were made, after all.
Chill bro. You're getting too heated up. I never said that I "know" anything. Noone can know anything (except the author) because there was not enough information. That's why I said in my previous comment that using "could have" and "assumptions" can't be helped in this case. I was just pointing out another possibilities.Using your own reasoning then, how do you know that they were nothing more than strangers?
There is zero information to show us that the Son used any kind of evidence or information from a third party , and at the same time the fact is that there is zero information to show us how deeply connected the MC and the Feudal lord were, heck one could easily suggest that the feudal lord is so angry because he feels deeply hurt by the MC's supposed betrayal and breach of trust.
Also, saying that he got the info from his son is not an excuse(and as the manga showed us the son would need no proof at all, since his father is blinded by affection when it comes to him), he is a not only a doting father he is a Feudal Lord, his position demands he actually takes matters seriously and that he conducts actual an investigation on a reported crime.
Also again it matters if the fang was real, furthermore if he had used the money he had to procure the fang, that purchase could have been easily traced back to the MC, it's not like the Feudal Lord's servant wearing a butler outfit(and as we have already seen the MC only has butler outfits to the point where he had to wear one while enrolling in the academy) could have gone unnoticed while spending any amount money. Besides, the Feudal lord called it a fake out of hand.
And again the animosity towards the MC is not something you would show to a stranger, but rather someone who you feel hurt your feelings and betrayed your trust in them. A stranger would have been sent off by another servant or at best the aide and not the Feudal Lord himself.