Hajirau Kimi ga Mitainda - Ch. 71.1 - I came over

[77px]

Oh no, the idiot

 

[Dex973]

oh god don't tell me he's gonna fuck them all before the main girl

 

[Knighto]

She is so trashy i felt the non canon chapter in which she becomes the cum dump of Netori-kun was deserved

author made her like that in the main series so the doujin wouldn't make the readers mad, author is an evil mad lad.

"i kept the innocent girl act"

bitch you raped an underage boy, wtf

yeah, and for the apologist, she still made a minor drink alcohol or "tempt" him to have sex, and the next day asked to be her partner on the side, that's no innocent girl at all hahaha.

 

[dexdoujinmanga]

Maybe I should change my name into "Netori"...

 

[Doutorfunga]

she came

She came, she saw... Will she get come on?

 

[Jebsu]

If they're really not going to do absolutely anything with teach and mc doing, not even mentioning it anymore, why did he do those chapters???

 

[Prefo66]

Thanks for the chapter! I really like all the characters in this manga so it's always fun to read it (yes, even Ekoda).

 

[Galder]

It will keep happening till she's gone from the story, fuck her


And there's no bs there when she literally did it

if you had a working brain, you'd know she didn't. sexual assault and sexual coercion, sure. rape, hell no.
also, i REALLY hope you're smart enough to know the author won't give a rat's ass about discussions on a fucking PIRATING site lmao
anything what's said here has no impact on the story whatsoever.

 

[Deadlybat]

if you had a working brain, you'd know she didn't. sexual assault and sexual coercion, sure. rape, hell no.
also, i REALLY hope you're smart enough to know the author won't give a rat's ass about discussions on a fucking PIRATING site lmao
anything what's said here has no impact on the story whatsoever.

First, given that penetration occurred, the dismissal of rape is entirely incorrect. Rape, by definition, is a form of sexual assault that specifically involves non-consensual sexual penetration. Acknowledging sexual assault and coercion while rejecting rape contradicts legal definitions.

Second, claiming that discussions on a pirating site have no impact is shortsighted. Fan discussions on any platform shape the broader interpretation of the work. These conversations influence how future readers perceive the story, making them relevant to the overall reception.

 

[frankieMuniez]

Tee Hee, sorry I raped the guy you liked. Guess I'm just not cut out to keep raping kids.

 

[frankieMuniez]

if you had a working brain, you'd know she didn't. sexual assault and sexual coercion, sure. rape, hell no.
also, i REALLY hope you're smart enough to know the author won't give a rat's ass about discussions on a fucking PIRATING site lmao
anything what's said here has no impact on the story whatsoever.

Nope, we've had this discussion a dozen times with this manga. It is objectively rape. This is textbook date rape, she found a minor, slipped him alcohol, and had sex with him when he was in a state of inebriation. This is rape, stop with the coomer nonsense.

 

[BobBob]

Sex with Touka? Or will Kaho, freshly motivated, also go to his house and stop them?

 

[Nuggz]

Yeah it would be best for people to realise that Teach raping MC is going to be ignored.

I completely forgot what chapter that happened on

 

[phil777]

Onee-san is on the attack!

Onee-san is invading?!

 

[chipusu]

 

[hiddentheory]

Now it's onee-san's turn to rape him!

 

[Mordenheim]

First, given that penetration occurred, the dismissal of rape is entirely incorrect. Rape, by definition, is a form of sexual assault that specifically involves non-consensual sexual penetration. Acknowledging sexual assault and coercion while rejecting rape contradicts legal definitions.

Second, claiming that discussions on a pirating site have no impact is shortsighted. Fan discussions on any platform shape the broader interpretation of the work. These conversations influence how future readers perceive the story, making them relevant to the overall reception.

The problem here is the 'non-consensual' part. He was legal at the time, she did ask for consent and pretty much received it. <- Those are the facts, no need it to discuss it further.
The argument more or less revolves around his drinking alcohol before the act. The 'rape' faction claims that he was inebriated and thus unable to give the consent while the 'not-rape' faction arguments that he didn't drink enough to affect his judgement. So there is that.

 

[Nuclear_Feacesist]

thanks for the quick translation as always. and after some ppl departing, i thought this "rapist" bullshit finally stopped. but ppl are still going on about this, like holy shit!

They have a valid reason to do so. If the gender roles were reversed there would be a lot more complaints and You'd probably be called a weirdo for making a comment like this.

 

[Kushikime]

Thanks for the chapter

 

[Deadlybat]

The problem here is the 'non-consensual' part. He was legal at the time, she did ask for consent and pretty much received it. <- Those are the facts, no need it to discuss it further.
The argument more or less revolves around his drinking alcohol before the act. The 'rape' faction claims that he was inebriated and thus unable to give the consent while the 'not-rape' faction arguments that he didn't drink enough to affect his judgement. So there is that.

I'm not going to debate the merits of the issue, as it’s clear everyone has already made up their minds, and that's unlikely to change. But there's a crucial point that can't be ignored: you can't acknowledge sexual assault and coercion while rejecting the term 'rape,' especially when penetration occurred. If you're admitting that assault and coercion happened, and there was penetration, then by definition, rape occurred. Dismissing it while accepting other forms of assault creates a logical contradiction.