maybe you already read it so you already got spoiled what happen.I dont know but this scene kinda felt less impactful then it did in the novel. Dont get me wrong, it was pretty faithful but just felt lessened somehow.
Nah he says that "Who will pay for my lottery tickets?"He doesnt look that scum.
no, i just mean the visual, how the art is draw. That why i say if you hide the text, which mean without the context.Nah he says that "Who will pay for my lottery tickets?"
U can already tell that he is a very abusive father
He is type of a father who will beat his kids when he lose lottery to relieve their rage and frustration
Heck if he got more to the down might gonna sell his daughter to cover his debts and loses
Ah I see okay I understandno, i just mean the visual, how the art is draw. That why i say if you hide the text, which mean without the context.
It's really interesting how visual mediums have the potential to convey scenes in ways that writing can't, but it's always disappointing when they don't use that potential and end up taking away the impact of the original instead of enhancing it through its own medium. I hear youI dont know but this scene kinda felt less impactful then it did in the novel. Dont get me wrong, it was pretty faithful but just felt lessened somehow.
Will a crowbar do?Does anybody have a knife? Or even better, a shotgun? Asking for a friend btw